Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you’re better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not)
Volume: 102, Issue: 1, Pages: 76 - 94
Published: Jan 1, 2007
Abstract
A common social comparison bias—the better-than-average-effect—is frequently described as psychologically equivalent to the individual-level judgment bias known as overconfidence. However, research has found “Hard–easy” effects for each bias that yield a seemingly paradoxical reversal: Hard tasks tend to produce overconfidence but worse-than-average perceptions, whereas easy tasks tend to produce underconfidence and better-than-average effects....
Paper Details
Title
Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you’re better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not)
Published Date
Jan 1, 2007
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
76 - 94
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History