Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Papers 2156
1 page of 216 pages (2,156 results)
#1Raphael Flepp (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 5
#2Philippe Meier (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 1
Last. Egon Franck (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 25
view all 3 authors...
Abstract We test the realization effect, i.e., that risk-taking is greater after paper outcomes than after realized outcomes, using gambling data from a real casino. During a particular casino visit, customers likely perceive that gains and losses are paper outcomes, whereas leaving the casino realizes the final account balance. Using individual-level slot machine gambling records, we find that risk-taking after both paper losses and paper gains increases within a visit and that this effect is m...
#1Catarina R. Fernandes (Emory University)
#2Siyu Yu (Rice University)H-Index: 5
Last. Nathan C. Pettit (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 11
view all 6 authors...
Abstract Individuals belong to multiple groups across various domains of life, which in aggregate constitute a portfolio of potentially distinct levels of experienced status. We propose a two-factor model for assessing the effects of an individual’s status portfolio, based on status average (mean status level across groups) and status variance (degree to which status varies across those groups). Five studies using samples in general-life and work-specific contexts reveal the importance of both s...
#1Huy Le (UTSA: University of Texas at San Antonio)H-Index: 23
#2Liyao Pan (State University of New York at Oneonta)
Abstract Justice scholars have raised concerns about the potential redundancy of organizational justice constructs as their measures were often found to be highly correlated with one another. However, investigation into the problem has been difficult because measurement artifacts attenuated correlations between measures, masking the true extent of construct overlaps. Applying a recent methodological advance that allows correcting for the biasing effect of measurement artifacts, we conducted two ...
#1Francesca Valsesia (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 1
#2Joseph C. Nunes (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 21
Last. Andrea Ordanini (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
Abstract This work investigates self-promotion partitioning, a strategy used in group conversations by self-promoters trying to overcome the self-promotion dilemma – a desire to share self-enhancing information without appearing to be overtly bragging. Self-promotion partitioning occurs when individuals partition their audience by addressing one or more specific recipients, deliberately turning unaddressed recipients into “bystanders.” Across a series of experiments and the analysis of secondary...
#1Michael Schaerer (Singapore Management University)H-Index: 9
#2Trevor Foulk (UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)H-Index: 9
Last. Satish Krishnan (Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)H-Index: 10
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Due to its pervasive negative consequences, failing to understand the origins of paranoia can be costly for organizations. Prior research suggests that powerful employees are particularly likely to experience paranoia as others want to exploit the resources they control, implying that employees low in power should feel less paranoid. In contrast, we build on Conservation of Resources Theory and sociocultural perspectives of power to argue that the inherent vulnerability associated with ...
#1Daniel A. Effron (LBS: London Business School)H-Index: 15
#2Medha Raj (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 4
Abstract Imagine your boss asks you to evaluate the work performance of a coworker whom you happen to like or dislike for reasons unrelated to the performance. This situation poses an interpersonal conflict of interest because the fact that you like or dislike the coworker could undermine your professional obligation to offer an objective evaluation. We hypothesize that people are less likely to disclose conflicts of interest that involve disliking as opposed to liking, because they worry that d...
#1Meir Barneron (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 2
#2Shoham Choshen-Hillel (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 9
Last. Ilan Yaniv (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 25
view all 3 authors...
Abstract We investigate individual decisions that produce gains for oneself, while imposing losses on a group of others. We theorize, based on the notion of empathy, that decision-makers consider the magnitude of the pain or loss they inflict on an individual in the group, but are largely insensitive to the number of individuals in the group who suffer losses. Studies involving personal choices or judgments of others’ choices largely confirmed these predictions. They also revealed a dispersion e...
#1Gordon T. Kraft-Todd (BC: Boston College)H-Index: 14
#2David G. Rand (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 53
Abstract How can individual scientists most effectively spread the adoption of open science practices? Engaging in open science practices presents a social dilemma because they are individually costly (given the current incentive schemes in academia) but collectively beneficial (due to production of higher quality and more accessible science). Mechanisms for promoting cooperation in social dilemmas typically rely on normativity—but open science practices are still comparatively rare. Further, in...
Top fields of study
Social relation
Cognitive psychology
Task (project management)
Welfare economics
Social psychology