Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.

Published on Apr 1, 2021in Journal of General Internal Medicine4.597
· DOI :10.1007/S11606-020-06213-2
Christine M. Gunn2
Estimated H-index: 2
(BU: Boston University),
Ariel Maschke3
Estimated H-index: 3
(BU: Boston University)
+ 3 AuthorsTracy A. Battaglia22
Estimated H-index: 22
(BU: Boston University)
Limited health literacy is a driver of cancer disparities and associated with less participation in medical decisions. Mammography screening decisions are an exemplar of where health literacy may impact decision-making and outcomes. To describe informational needs and shared decision-making (SDM) experiences among women ages 40–54 who have limited health literacy and primary care providers (PCPs). Qualitative, in-depth interviews explored experiences with mammography counseling and SDM. Women ages 40–54 with limited health literacy and no history of breast cancer or mammogram in the prior 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a Boston academic, safety-net hospital. PCPs practicing at this site were eligible for PCP interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A set of deductive codes for each stakeholder group was developed based on literature and the interview guide. Inductive codes were generated during codebook development. Codes were compared within and across patient and PCP interviews to create themes relevant to mammography decision-making. The average age of 25 interviewed patients was 46.5; 18 identified as black, 3 as Hispanic, 2 as non-Hispanic white, and 2 had no recorded race or ethnicity. Of 20 PCPs, 15 were female; 12 had practiced for >5 years. Patients described a lack of technical (appropriate tests and what they do) and process (what happens during a mammogram visit) knowledge, viewing these as necessary for decision-making. PCPs were reluctant to engage patients with limited health literacy in SDM due to time constraints and feared that increased information might confuse patients or deter them from having mammograms. Both groups felt pre-visit education would facilitate mammography-related SDM during clinical visits. Both patients and PCPs perceived a need for tools to relay technical and process knowledge about mammography prior to clinical encounters to address the scope of information that patients with limited health literacy desired.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
29 Citations
3 Citations
#1Weijia Shi (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 1
#2Rebekah H. Nagler (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 18
Last. Sarah E. Gollust (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 39
view all 4 authors...
ABSTRACTIn recent years, there has been a shift toward promoting informed decision making for mammography screening for average-risk women in their 40s. Professional organizations such as the Ameri...
3 CitationsSource
#1Huei Lan Chang (NTU: National Taiwan University)H-Index: 1
#2Fang Shan Li (NTU: National Taiwan University)H-Index: 1
Last. Chiou Fen Lin (TMU: Taipei Medical University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Purpose: Shared decision making promotes patient participation in medical decisions. This study aims to explore the decision-making situation and influencing factors in patients with cancer. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted for patient with cancers in regional teaching hospitals in northern Taiwan using short-form Mandarin Health Literacy Scale (s-MHLS) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), with total 120 cases collected from January 15 to Apr...
4 CitationsSource
#1Sarina Schrager (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 13
#2Elizabeth S. Burnside (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 16
Last. Elizabeth S. Burnside (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 19
view all 2 authors...
Abstract The latest recommendations on breast cancer screening in women from 40 to 49 years charge primary care providers (PCPs) with completing shared decision-making with women about screening ma...
4 CitationsSource
#1Lori L. DuBenske (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 16
#2Sarina Schrager (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 13
Last. Elizabeth S. Burnside (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 19
view all 7 authors...
Background New guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for women and their clinician in consideration of breast cancer screening, particularly for women ages 35–50 where guidelines for routine mammography are controversial. A number of models offer general guidelines for SDM across clinical practice, yet they do not offer specific guidance about conducting SDM in mammography. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to identify the key elements of breast cancer screening SDM and...
6 CitationsSource
#1Nancy L. Keating (Harvard University)H-Index: 77
#2Lydia E. Pace (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 18
35 CitationsSource
#1Sophia Siedlikowski (McGill University)H-Index: 2
#2Carolyn Ells (McGill University)H-Index: 16
Last. Gillian Bartlett (McGill University)H-Index: 26
view all 3 authors...
Context A decision to undertake screening for breast cancer often takes place within the primary care setting, but current controversies such as overdiagnosis and inconsistent screening recommendations based on evolving evidence render this a challenging process, particularly for average-risk women. Given the responsibility of primary care providers in counseling women in this decision-making process, it is important to understand their thoughts on these controversies and how they manage uncerta...
6 CitationsSource
#1Mark Manning (WSU: Wayne State University)H-Index: 10
#2Terrance L. Albrecht (WSU: Wayne State University)H-Index: 47
Last. Kristen S. Purrington (WSU: Wayne State University)H-Index: 10
view all 6 authors...
Prior research shows between-race differences in women's knowledge and emotions related to having dense breasts, thus suggesting that between-race differences in behavioral decision-making following receipt of breast density (BD) notifications are likely. Guided by the theory of planned behavior, this study examined differences in emotion-related responses (i.e., anxiety, worry, confusion) and behavioral cognition (e.g., intentions, behavioral attitudes) following receipt of BD notifications amo...
9 CitationsSource
#1Kathryn A. Martinez (Cleveland Clinic)H-Index: 17
#2Abhishek Deshpande (Cleveland Clinic)H-Index: 32
Last. Michael B. Rothberg (Cleveland Clinic)H-Index: 55
view all 6 authors...
Abstract Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends providers engage women aged 40–49 years in shared decision-making (SDM) for mammography. This requires mammography knowledge, adequate time to discuss screening, and self-confidence in doing so. Yet, to date, no studies have assessed provider readiness to engage younger women in SDM. Methods: An online survey of primary care providers was conducted in Cleveland in 2015. It inquired about knowledge of screening benefits and h...
6 CitationsSource
#1Archana Radhakrishnan (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 6
#2Sarah A. Nowak (AN: RAND Corporation)H-Index: 9
Last. Craig Evan Pollack (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 33
view all 5 authors...
32 CitationsSource
#1Lori L. DuBenske (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 16
#2Sarina Schrager (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 13
Last. Elizabeth S. Burnside (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 19
view all 6 authors...
As shared decision-making increasingly influences screening mammography, understanding similarities and differences between patients and physician perspectives becomes crucially important. This study compares women's and physicians' experiences of mammography shared decision-making. Results reflect the critical gaps which exist between women's expectations and physicians' confidence in shared decision-making regarding screening mammography.
11 CitationsSource
Cited By2
#1Jennifer L. Holcomb (University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston)
#2Gayla M. Ferguson (University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston)
Last. Linda Highfield (University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
Multi-level organizational stakeholder engagement plays an important role across the research process in a clinical setting. Stakeholders provide organizational specific adaptions in evidence-based interventions to ensure effective adoption, implementation, and sustainability. Stakeholder engagement strategies involve building mutual trust, providing clear communication, and seeking feedback. Using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and The International Assoc...
#1Ariel Maschke (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 3
#2Michael K. Paasche-Orlow (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 60
Last. Christine M. Gunn (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 9
view all 6 authors...
Starting breast cancer screening at age 40 versus 50 may increase potential harms frequency with a small mortality benefit. Younger women's screening decisions, therefore, may be complex. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for women under 50 and may support women under 55 for whom guidelines vary. How women with limited health literacy (LHL) approach breast cancer screening decision-making is less understood, and most SDM tools are not designed with their input. This phenomenological st...