Original paper
Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers
Abstract
This article updates the guidance published in 2015 for authors submitting papers to British Journal of Pharmacology (Curtis et al. , 2015) and is intended to provide the rubric for peer review. Thus, it is directed towards authors, reviewers and editors. Explanations for many of the requirements were outlined previously and are not restated here. The new guidelines are intended to replace those published previously. The guidelines have been...
Paper Details
Title
Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers
Published Date
Mar 9, 2018
Volume
175
Issue
7
Pages
987 - 993
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History