Gene

Marketing

Algorithm

Benchmark (surveying)

Deconvolution

Biology

Statistics

Cartography

Data integration

Benchmarking

Data mining

Computer science

Computational biology

Business

Spatial analysis

Genetics

Transcriptome

Mathematics

Pipeline (software)

Geography

RNA-Seq

Programming language

Gene expression

Nature Methods

Spatial transcriptomics approaches have substantially advanced our capacity to detect the spatial distribution of RNA transcripts in tissues, yet it remains challenging to characterize whole-transcriptome-level data for single cells in space. Addressing this need, researchers have developed integration methods to combine spatial transcriptomic data with single-cell RNA-seq data to predict the spatial distribution of undetected transcripts and/or perform cell type deconvolution of spots in histological sections. However, to date, no independent studies have comparatively analyzed these integration methods to benchmark their performance. Here we present benchmarking of 16 integration methods using 45 paired datasets (comprising both spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-seq data) and 32 simulated datasets. We found that Tangram, gimVI, and SpaGE outperformed other integration methods for predicting the spatial distribution of RNA transcripts, whereas Cell2location, SpatialDWLS, and RCTD are the top-performing methods for the cell type deconvolution of spots. We provide a benchmark pipeline to help researchers select optimal integration methods to process their datasets. This work presents a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of computational methods that integrates spatial and single-cell transcriptomics data for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution.

Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution