Specificity effects in reasoning with counterintuitive and arbitrary conditionals

Volume: 50, Issue: 2, Pages: 366 - 377
Published: Sep 23, 2021
Abstract
When people have prior knowledge about an inference, they accept conclusions from specific conditionals (e.g., "If Jack does sports, then Jack loses weight") more strongly than for unspecific conditionals (e.g., "If a person does sports, then the person loses weight"). But can specific phrasings also elevate the acceptance of conclusions from unbelievable conditionals? In Experiment 1, we varied the specificity of counterintuitive conditionals,...
Paper Details
Title
Specificity effects in reasoning with counterintuitive and arbitrary conditionals
Published Date
Sep 23, 2021
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
366 - 377
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.