Cross-notation knowledge of fractions and decimals.

Published on Jan 1, 2022in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
· DOI :10.1016/J.JECP.2021.105210
David W. Braithwaite7
Estimated H-index: 7
(FSU: Florida State University),
Jake McMullen13
Estimated H-index: 13
(UTU: University of Turku),
Michelle Hurst5
Estimated H-index: 5
(U of C: University of Chicago)
Understanding fractions and decimals requires not only understanding each notation separately, or within-notation knowledge, but also understanding relations between notations, or cross-notation knowledge. Multiple notations pose a challenge for learners but could also present an opportunity, in that cross-notation knowledge could help learners to achieve a better understanding of rational numbers than could easily be achieved from within-notation knowledge alone. This hypothesis was tested by reanalyzing three published datasets involving fourth- to eighth-grade children from the United States and Finland. All datasets included measures of rational number arithmetic, within-notation magnitude knowledge (e.g., accuracy in comparing fractions vs. fractions and decimals vs. decimals), and cross-notation magnitude knowledge (e.g., accuracy in comparing fractions vs. decimals). Consistent with the hypothesis, cross-notation magnitude knowledge predicted fraction and decimal arithmetic when controlling for within-notation magnitude knowledge. Furthermore, relations between within-notation magnitude knowledge and arithmetic were not notation specific; fraction magnitude knowledge did not predict fraction arithmetic more than decimal arithmetic, and decimal magnitude knowledge did not predict decimal arithmetic more than fraction arithmetic. Implications of the findings for assessing rational number knowledge and learning and teaching about rational numbers are discussed.
5 CitationsSource
#1Jing TianH-Index: 5
Last. Robert S. SieglerH-Index: 100
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Jing Tian (TU: Temple University)H-Index: 5
#2David W. Braithwaite (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 7
Last. Robert S. Siegler (Columbia University)H-Index: 100
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Three rational number notations -- fractions, decimals, and percentages -- have existed in their modern forms for over 300 years, suggesting that each notation serves a distinct function. However, it is unclear what these functions are and how people choose which notation to use in a given situation. In the present article, we propose quantification process theory to account for people’s preferences among fractions, decimals, and percentages. According to this theory, the preferred nota...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jake McMullen (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 13
#2Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 15
Last. Robert S. Siegler (ATC: Advanced Technology Center)H-Index: 100
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Adaptive expertise is a valued, but under-examined, feature of students' mathematical development (e.g. Hatano & Oura, 2012). The present study investigates the nature of adaptive expertise with rational number arithmetic. We therefore examined 394 7th and 8th graders’ rational number knowledge using both variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Performance on a measure of adaptive expertise with rational number arithmetic, the arithmetic sentence production task, appeared to b...
3 CitationsSource
#1Nancy Dyson (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 9
#2Nancy C. Jordan (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 42
Last. Luke Rinne (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 11
view all 5 authors...
The efficacy of a research-based fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties (N = 52) was examined. The intervention aimed to build understanding of fraction magnitudes on the number line. Key concepts were taught with a narrow range of denominators to develop deep understanding. The intervention was centered on a visual number line in the meaningful context of a color run race. Students were randomly assigned to the fraction sense intervention (n =...
12 CitationsSource
#1John V. Binzak (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 2
#2Edward M. Hubbard (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 24
Abstract Research on how humans understand the relative magnitude of symbolic fractions presents a unique case of the symbol-grounding problem with numbers. Specifically, how do people access a holistic sense of rational number magnitude from decimal fractions (e.g. 0.125) and common fractions (e.g. 1/8)? Researchers have previously suggested that people cannot directly access magnitude information from common fraction notation, but instead must use a form of calculation to access this meaning. ...
4 CitationsSource
#1Jake McMullen (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 13
#2Jo Van Hoof (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 9
Abstract Many students still have not developed a robust understanding of rational number concepts at the end of primary school, despite several years of instruction on the topic. The present study aims to examine the patterns, predictors, and outcomes of the development of rational number knowledge in lower secondary school. Latent transition analysis revealed that rational number development from primary to lower secondary school (N = 362) appears to follow similar patterns as in younger stude...
6 CitationsSource
#1Amelia S. Malone (Vandy: Vanderbilt University)H-Index: 7
#2Lynn S. Fuchs (Vandy: Vanderbilt University)H-Index: 125
Last. Lindsay Foreman-Murray (Vandy: Vanderbilt University)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess whether intervention with an integrated focus on fraction and decimal magnitude provides added value in improving rational number performance over intervention focused exclusively on fractions. We randomly assigned 4th graders with poor whole-number performance to 3 conditions: a business-as-usual control group and 2 variants of a validated fraction magnitude (FM) intervention. One variant of FM intervention included an integrated component on fra...
1 CitationsSource
#1David W. Braithwaite (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 7
#2Elena R. Leib (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 2
Last. Jake McMullen (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 13
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Understanding fractions is critical to mathematical development, yet many children struggle with fractions even after years of instruction. Fraction arithmetic is particularly challenging. The present study employed a computational model of fraction arithmetic learning, FARRA ( F raction A rithmetic R eflects R ules and A ssociations; Braithwaite, Pyke, and Siegler, 2017), to investigate individual differences in children’s fraction arithmetic. FARRA predicted four qualitatively distinc...
6 CitationsSource
#1Ilyse Resnick (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 11
#2Luke Rinne (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 11
Last. Nancy C. Jordan (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 42
view all 4 authors...
Reasoning about numerical magnitudes is a key aspect of mathematics learning. Most research examining the relation of magnitude understanding to general mathematics achievement has focused on whole number and fraction magnitudes. The present longitudinal study (N = 435) used a 3-step latent class analysis to examine reasoning about magnitudes on a decimal comparison task in 4th grade, before systematic decimals instruction. Three classes of response patterns were identified, indicating empirical...
7 CitationsSource
Cited By1