Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules
Abstract
Research on judgment and decision making has suggested that the System 2 process of slow thinking can help people to improve their decision making by reducing well-established statistical decision biases (including base rate neglect, probability matching, and the conjunction fallacy). In a large pre-registered study with 1,706 participants and 23,292 unique observations, we compare the effects of individual differences and behavioral...
Paper Details
Title
Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules
Published Date
Sep 1, 2020
Journal
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
660 - 684
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History