Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centers
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the inter-rater and intercenter reliability, usability, and utility of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), AMSTAR 2, and Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews (ROBIS).Study Design and SettingThis is a prospective evaluation using 30 systematic reviews of randomized trials, undertaken at three international centers.ResultsReviewers completed AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS in...
Paper Details
Title
Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centers
Published Date
Sep 1, 2020
Volume
125
Pages
9 - 15
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History