Cognitive psychology

Philosophy

Bayesian probability

Statistics

Social psychology

Bayes' theorem

Frequentist inference

Simplicity

Telecommunications

Economics

Core (optical fiber)

Computer science

PsycINFO

Psychology

Task (project management)

Mathematics

Management

Digitization

Political science

Epistemology

Econometrics

Artificial intelligence

MEDLINE

Bayesian inference

Computer vision

Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Humans are often characterized as Bayesian reasoners. Here, we question the core Bayesian assumption that probabilities reflect degrees of belief. Across eight studies, we find that people instead reason in a digital manner, assuming that uncertain information is either true or false when using that information to make further inferences. Participants learned about 2 hypotheses, both consistent with some information but one more plausible than the other. Although people explicitly acknowledged that the less-plausible hypothesis had positive probability, they ignored this hypothesis when using the hypotheses to make predictions. This was true across several ways of manipulating plausibility (simplicity, evidence fit, explicit probabilities) and a diverse array of task variations. Taken together, the evidence suggests that digitization occurs in prediction because it circumvents processing bottlenecks surrounding people’s ability to simulate outcomes in hypothetical worlds. These findings have implications for philosophy of science and for the organization of the mind. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Belief digitization: Do we treat uncertainty as probabilities or as bits?