Planting and harvesting innovation - an analysis of Samsung Electronics

Published on Dec 1, 2019in International Journal of Quality Innovation
· DOI :10.1186/S40887-019-0032-X
Seung Hoon Jang3
Estimated H-index: 3
(BU: Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania),
Sang M. Lee59
Estimated H-index: 59
(NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
+ 1 AuthorsDonghyun Choi7
Estimated H-index: 7
(Korea Aerospace University)
Sources
Abstract
This study explores how firms manage the entire life cycle of innovation projects based on the framework of harvesting and planting innovation. While harvesting innovation seeks new products in the expectation of financial performance in the short term, planting innovation pursues creating value over a long time period. Without proper management of the process of planting and harvesting innovation, firms with limited resources may not be successful in launching innovative new products to seize a momentum in high tech industries. To examine this issue, the case of Samsung Electronics (SE), now an electronics giant originated from a former developing country, is analyzed. SE has shown to effectively utilize co-innovation to maintain numerous planting and harvesting innovation projects. Both researchers and practitioners would be interested in learning about how SE shared risks of innovation investment with external partners at the early stage of innovation cycles.
Figures & Tables
Download
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2010
3 Authors (Fei Li, ..., Gang Zheng)
1 Citations
12 Citations
References37
Newest
#1Sang M. Lee (NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)H-Index: 59
#2Seongbae Lim (St. Mary's University)H-Index: 9
8 Citations
#1Sang M. Lee (NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)H-Index: 59
Innovation is the lifeline for every organization. The primary purpose of innovation is to apply new ideas or technologies to create new or added value for the organization. This narrow goal is for small “i”. In the dynamic digital age, however, the goal of innovation should be much more aspirational and noble: “doing well by doing good” for the society at large and humanity. This lofty goal of innovation is for large “I”. In this paper, we review the evolution process of innovation and propose ...
12 CitationsSource
#1Seung Hoon Jang (BU: Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 3
#2Christian Grandzol (BU: Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 7
This paper examines how firms in emerging economies implement value co-creation from the perspectives of harvesting innovation and planting innovation. Due to these firms' relative financial and managerial disadvantages, they must focus on the balance between innovation efforts and cash flows to ensure survival and growth. Employing the harvesting and planting categorisations enables examination of value co-creation practices for both the short and long term. Harvesting innovation seeks commerci...
3 CitationsSource
#2Michael E. RaynorH-Index: 12
Last. Rory McDonaldH-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
228 Citations
#1DonHee Lee (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 13
This study examines the effects of operational innovation and quality management (QM) practices on organizational performance in healthcare organizations. More specifically, this study explores relationships of operational innovation and QM practices on organizational performance. The proposed research model was tested using structural equation modeling through a set of hypotheses, based on the data collected from 239 hospitals each with more than 100 beds. The results indicated positive effects...
9 CitationsSource
#1Dara G. Schniederjans (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 12
#2Marc J. Schniederjans (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 30
With increasing market competition, organizations are striving for greater innovation in products and services. Quality management has the potential to invigorate an organization’s product, process and administrative innovation when strategically aligned with internal contingencies. This paper seeks to address the relationship between social and technical quality management with innovation. Moreover, this paper empirically assesses contingency factors including organization size, task and manage...
12 CitationsSource
#1David J. Teece (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 102
The dynamic capabilities framework has had a significant impact on strategic management theory and practice, but the sizable literature on the topic has not always been unified. This paper begins with a restatement of the framework encompassing clarifications and extensions that have occurred since it was introduced. The paper highlights key elements that have been omitted or poorly integrated into the dynamic capabilities literature: the role of individual action by entrepreneurial managers, th...
416 CitationsSource
#1Charles A. O'Reilly (Stanford University)H-Index: 79
#2Michael L. Tushman (Harvard University)H-Index: 85
Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit—to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies and markets where flexibility, autonomy, and experimentation are needed. In the past 15 years there has been an explosion of interest and research on this topic. We briefly review the current state of the research, highlighting what we know and don't...
770 CitationsSource
#1Henry Chesbrough (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 62
OVERVIEW:The term “open innovation” was introduced in my 2003 book, which outlined a new model for industrial innovation. Since that time, the concept has been adopted by hundreds of academic articles and been incorporated into the innovation practices of a similarly large number of companies. At the editors' invitation, this article reviews this recent history and offers a perspective on where open innovation is going in the future.
234 CitationsSource
#1Young Ryeol Park (Yonsei University)H-Index: 9
#2Jeoung Yul Lee (Hongik University)H-Index: 13
Last. Sunghoon Hong (Honam University)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
Purpose – The objective of this paper is to determine whether international entry‐order strategies by Korean chaebols affect the exit of their foreign subsidiaries.Design/methodology/approach – The sample consists of a set of 61 parent firms and their 500 foreign subsidiaries. The sample includes 27 Korean business groups, called chaebols, and spans 51 markets, during the period from 1999 to 2004. The study employs resource‐ and knowledge‐based views, and is based on the Cox's proportional hazar...
31 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
Purpose: This paper investigates key elements for supporting strategic management behaviour with actionable implications for multinational corporations in the ICT business sector. Design/methodology/approach: Samsung was chosen as a research case. A qualitative approach was applied to this study to develop a discussion framework with key elements which support innovative organisational behaviour. Findings: From an analysis of secondary data of academic discussions relating with business behaviou...
Source
Source