A Survey of School Administrators' Training and Support Related to Evaluating Special Education Teachers.

Published on Jun 20, 2018
· DOI :10.32674/JSARD.V3I1.1929
Janelle E. Rodl3
Estimated H-index: 3
,
Wes Bonifay7
Estimated H-index: 7
+ 1 AuthorsSarah Manchanda2
Estimated H-index: 2
Sources
Abstract
School administrators are often responsible for observing and evaluating special education teachers. The current study examined the training school administrators received, their needed knowledge and supports, and their confidence in performing job functions related to special education teacher evaluation. A total of 929 school administrators in California completed a 26-item survey in which they reported the training they had received, the usefulness of the training for informing practice, and the confidence they felt in evaluating special educators. Results indicated that most school administrators did not have a background in special education, did not receive training related to evaluating special educators, and felt less confident evaluating special educators than general educators. School administrators, especially those without a background in special education, may need more training and support related to evaluating special education teachers during preparation and in the early years of administration. Training and support should focus on evidence-based practices for teaching- ing students with disabilities.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2010
1 Author (Kathleen Hybl)
1998
1 Author (Judy L. Wald)
13 Citations
References9
Newest
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore high school administrators’ instructional leadership in math and science. Specifically, the study explored the feedback administrators provided to math and science teachers as part of their instructional supervision. A central goal for this study was to determine how differences in these content areas influenced the feedback administrators provided to teachers. Research Method/Approach: The study was completed in five, comprehensive high schools ...
28 CitationsSource
Teacher supervision and evaluation are important responsibilities of school principals. These processes support teachers' ongoing professional development, and evidence on teacher performance is needed to reach legally defensible decisions on continuing employment (Danielson & McGreal, 2000). However, teacher evaluation historically has not been fully effective in promoting these outcomes, particularly with special education teachers. Significant changes have occurred in curriculum standards, st...
6 Citations
#1Ann Sledge (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 1
#2Barbara L. Pazey (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 11
While teacher quality is recognized as a critical component in school reform and the pursuit of new teacher evaluation systems has gained national attention, the question of whether proposed teacher assessment models recognize and account for the unique roles and responsibilities of special education teachers has gone largely unnoticed. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a review of current efforts to reform practices in teacher assessment, (b) describe recommendations for emerging te...
22 CitationsSource
189 Citations
#1Eric S. Taylor (Harvard University)H-Index: 15
#2John H. Tyler (NBER: National Bureau of Economic Research)H-Index: 24
The effect of evaluation on employee performance is traditionally studied in the context of the principal-agent problem. Evaluation can, however, also be characterized as an investment in the evaluated employee's human capital. We study a sample of mid-career public school teachers where we can consider these two types of evaluation effect separately. Employee evaluation is a particularly salient topic in public schools where teacher effectiveness varies substantially and where teacher evaluatio...
43 CitationsSource
#1Ronald A. Styron (USM: University of Southern Mississippi)H-Index: 7
#2Steven D. LeMire (UND: University of North Dakota)H-Index: 4
There has been an abundance of research documenting perceived deficiencies in traditional principal preparation programs, but little field data have been collected. As such, the authors of this study sought to assess the satisfaction of practitioners, high school principals, with their preparation programs. Questionnaires were received from 374 participants located at schools within four southeastern states. Using descriptive and inferential statistics, data were generated and analyzed illustrat...
20 CitationsSource
Wyoming principals were surveyed regarding their perceptions of the strengths and de cits of their preparation program, their professional development needs as beginning principals, and the areas in which their districts o er professional development. Findings indicated much variation in perceptions of preparation program strengths and de cits. The internship was viewed as valuable in providing experience of day-to-day school administration; however, time commitment and nancial burdens were of c...
20 Citations
#1Allyson Holbrook (UIC: University of Illinois at Chicago)H-Index: 31
#1Allyson L. Holbrook (UIC: University of Illinois at Chicago)
Last. Alison Pfent (OSU: Ohio State University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
299 CitationsSource
#1Frederick M. Hess (American Enterprise Institute)H-Index: 40
#2Andrew P. Kelly (American Enterprise Institute)H-Index: 8
School leadership is the key to school improvement. In a new era of accountability, where school leaders are expected to demonstrate bottom-line results and use data to drive decisions, the skill and knowledge of principals matter more than ever. Meanwhile, public school choice, charter schooling, developments in teacher compensation and hiring, and site-based budgeting have created new opportunities for principal leadership. In this environment, school improvement rests to an unprecedented degr...
278 Citations
Cited By7
Newest
Source
#1Adam B. Lockwood (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 4
#2Ryan L. Farmer (OSU: Oklahoma State University–Stillwater)H-Index: 5
Last. Karen Sealander (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 7
view all 5 authors...
This study examined current academic achievement test use and assessment practices in the United States. Special education administrators from 725 US school districts were surveyed using an online ...
Source
In this study, research centered on the degree to which principals felt knowledgeable about basic generic leadership as well as special education functions. Current principals were selected from th...
Source
#1Corrine Aramburo (SFSU: San Francisco State University)
#2Janelle E. Rodl (SFSU: San Francisco State University)H-Index: 3
This current study is an exploratory, secondary data analysis of a survey assessing training, district support, and confidence of school administrators when it comes to special education teacher evaluation. The present study specifically examines (a) if the influence of district training regarding special education teachers influences the confidence of school administrators to evaluate and observe special education teachers, (b) if administrators with a general education credential differ from a...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jessica Suhrheinrich (SDSU: San Diego State University)H-Index: 11
#2Sarah R. Rieth (SDSU: San Diego State University)H-Index: 4
Last. Aubyn C. Stahmer (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 39
view all 4 authors...
Classroom pivotal response teaching (CPRT) is an evidence-based practice (EBP) adapted for classroom use. A recent effectiveness trial of CPRT involved training 98 special education classrooms in S...
4 CitationsSource