Experiential Gifts Foster Stronger Social Relationships Than Material Gifts

Published on Dec 5, 2016in Journal of Consumer Research
· DOI :10.1093/JCR/UCW067
Cindy Chan4
Estimated H-index: 4
(U of T: University of Toronto),
Cindy Chan1
Estimated H-index: 1
(U of T: University of Toronto),
Cassie Mogilner19
Estimated H-index: 19
(UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)
Sources
Abstract
Interpersonal relationships are essential to well-being, and gifts are often given to cultivate these relationships. To inform gift givers of what to give and to gain insight into the connecting function of gifts, this research investigates what type of gift is better at strengthening relationships according to gift recipients—material gifts (objects for recipients to keep) or experiential gifts (events for recipients to live through). Experiments examining actual gift exchanges in real-life relationships reveal that experiential gifts produce greater improvements in relationship strength than material gifts, regardless of whether the gift giver and recipient consume the gift together. The relationship improvements that recipients derive from experiential gifts stem from the intensity of emotion that is evoked when they consume the gifts, rather than when the gifts are received. Giving experiential gifts is thus identified as a highly effective form of prosocial spending.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1,239 Citations
131 Citations
72 Citations
References73
Newest
#1Morgan K. Ward (Emory University)H-Index: 6
#2Susan M. Broniarczyk (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 25
AbstractGift givers balance their goal to please recipients with gifts that match recipient preferences against their own goal to signal relational closeness with gifts that demonstrate their knowledge of the recipient. Five studies in a gift registry context show that when close (vs. distant) givers receive attribution for the gifts they choose, they are more likely to diverge from the registry to choose items that signal their close relationships. The authors find that close givers’ divergence...
28 CitationsSource
#1Hal E. Hershfield (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 17
#2Cassie Mogilner (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 19
Last. Uri Barnea (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Money and time are both scarce resources that people believe would bring them greater happiness. But would people prefer having more money or more time? And how does one’s preference between resources relate to happiness? Across studies, we asked thousands of Americans whether they would prefer more money or more time. Although the majority of people chose more money, choosing more time was associated with greater happiness—even controlling for existing levels of available time and money. Additi...
29 CitationsSource
#1Aaron C. Weidman (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 11
#2Elizabeth W. Dunn (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 37
Although research suggests that people derive more happiness from buying life experiences than material objects, almost no studies have examined how people actually feel while consuming real-world experiential and material purchases. In the present research, we provided the first examination of people’s momentary happiness while consuming these purchases. Participants were randomly assigned to spend C$20 on a material versus experiential purchase (Study 1) or to report a material versus experien...
22 CitationsSource
#1Amit Kumar (Cornell University)H-Index: 9
#2Thomas Gilovich (Cornell University)H-Index: 61
Extending previous research on the hedonic benefits of spending money on doing rather than having, this paper investigates when people prefer to consume experiential and material purchases. We contend that the preferred timing of consumption tends to be more immediate for things (like clothing and gadgets) than for experiences (like vacations and meals out). First, we examine whether consumers exhibit a stronger preference to delay consumption of experiential purchases compared to material goods...
26 CitationsSource
#1Michael I. Norton (Harvard University)H-Index: 49
#2Derek D. RuckerH-Index: 42
Last. Cait Lamberton (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
16 CitationsSource
#1Yang Yang (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 8
#2Jeff Galak (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 19
Sentimental value is a highly prevalent, yet largely understudied phenomenon. We introduce the construct of sentimental value and investigate how and why sentimental value influences hedonic adaptation. Across 7 studies, we examine the antecedents of sentimental value and demonstrate its effect on hedonic adaptation using both naturally occurring and experimentally manipulated items with sentimental value. We further test the underlying process linking sentimental value and hedonic adaptation by...
19 CitationsSource
#1Lisa A. Cavanaugh (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 11
#2Francesca Gino (Harvard University)H-Index: 57
Last. Gavan J. Fitzsimons (Duke University)H-Index: 36
view all 3 authors...
Gifts that support a worthy cause (i.e., “gifts that give twice”), such as a charitable donation in the recipient’s name, have become increasingly popular. Recipients generally enjoy the idea of these gifts, which not only benefit others in need but also make individuals feel good about themselves. But do givers accurately predict appreciation of these types of gifts? Across three studies, we show that gift givers mis-predict appreciation for socially responsible gifts, and that their mis-predic...
18 CitationsSource
#1Lara B. Aknin (SFU: Simon Fraser University)H-Index: 18
#2Lauren J. Human (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 16
Abstract Gift giving is an ancient, ubiquitous and familiar behavior often thought to build and foster social connections, but what types of gifts are most effective in increasing closeness between the giver and the recipient? In six studies we explore both the perceptions and relational outcomes of gifts that reflect the giver ( giver-centric gifts ) and gifts that reflect the recipient ( recipient-centric gifts ). Across studies, we find a strong and consistent preference for giving and receiv...
21 CitationsSource
#1Stephanie M. TullyH-Index: 6
#2Hal E. HershfieldH-Index: 17
Last. Tom MeyvisH-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
Consumers with limited discretionary money face important trade-offs when deciding how to spend it. In the current research, we suggest that feelings of financial constraint increase consumers’ concern about the lasting utility of their purchases, which in turn increases their preference for material goods over experiences. The results of seven studies confirm that the consideration of financial constraints shifts consumers’ preferences toward material goods (rather than experiences), and that t...
44 CitationsSource
#1Thomas Gilovich (Cornell University)H-Index: 61
#2Amit Kumar (Cornell University)H-Index: 9
Last. Lily Jampol (Cornell University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Abstract To live in the developed world is to live in a consumerist society. Although the broader forces that created this society have led to unprecedented material abundance, scholars have maintained that these benefits have come at a significant psychological cost. An important question, then, is how these psychological costs can be minimized. With that in mind, we review research showing that people derive more satisfaction from experiential purchases than material purchases. We then summari...
148 CitationsSource
Cited By38
Newest
#1Peggy J. Liu (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 11
#2Ernest Baskin (""St. Joe's"": Saint Joseph's University)H-Index: 9
The trade-off between quality and quantity pervades many domains of life, including that of making product choices for ourselves and others, whether as gifts or as everyday favors. In five studies ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Sydney Chinchanachokchai (University of Akron)H-Index: 4
#2Theeranuch Pusaksrikit (Chula: Chulalongkorn University)H-Index: 3
Abstract For romantic couples, posting romantic gift pictures on social network sites has become a tool for public declarations of love. This research investigates how self-construal influences recipients’ romantic gift-posting behavior across three popular social network sites (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) at the country and individual levels. In the first two of three studies, we demonstrate that interdependent self-construal participants are more likely to post romantic gift pictures on ...
Source
#1Evan Weingarten (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 1
#1Evan Weingarten (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 7
Last. Joseph K. Goodman (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 13
view all 2 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Julian Givi (WVU: West Virginia University)H-Index: 4
#2Jeff Galak (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 19
Source
#1Daniel M. Grossman (UMSL: University of Missouri–St. Louis)
#2Ryan Rahinel (UC: University of Cincinnati)H-Index: 8
Source
#1Rogelio Puente-Díaz (Universidad Anáhuac México Norte)H-Index: 10
#2Judith Cavazos-Arroyo (UPAEP: Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla)H-Index: 7
Source
#1Anika Schumacher (Grenoble School of Management)
#2Caroline Goukens (UM: Maastricht University)H-Index: 6
Last. Kelly Geyskens (UM: Maastricht University)H-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Lujun Su (CSU: Central South University)H-Index: 16
#2Jin Cheng (CSU: Central South University)H-Index: 1
Last. Scott R. Swanson (UWEC: University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire)H-Index: 24
view all 3 authors...
Abstract This research starts by distinguishing how different emotion components may be stimulated by different product types. Based on initial findings, a conceptual model is developed and tested that investigates a tourist's emotional arousal as a mediating variable between the tourism activity type and subsequent storytelling intentions. Based on social facilitation theory and self-expansion model, this research further investigates the potential moderating effect of having a travel companion...
4 CitationsSource
Source
#1Sisi Li (HKU: University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 1
#2Jacky C. K. Ng (Hong Kong Shue Yan University)H-Index: 5
Last. Chin Ming Hui (CUHK: The Chinese University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
Source