Soil Structure Interactions of Retaining Walls

Published on Feb 8, 2016
· DOI :10.1061/9780784479742.036
Ashok K. Chugh7
Estimated H-index: 7
(USBR: United States Bureau of Reclamation),
Joseph F. Labuz32
Estimated H-index: 32
C. Guney Olgun15
Estimated H-index: 15
(VT: Virginia Tech)
Structural stiffness of a retaining wall, properties of the foundation soils, and the construction sequence, including order of placement of fill in front and back of the wall, affect movements and hence the development of active and passive earth pressures. Retaining walls considered in this paper are the traditional reinforced concrete type usually constructed along highways and dam spillway structures – the highway wall is a simple cantilever and the spillway wall in an earth dam is a counterfort. Another type of earth retaining structure considered is an unconventional type, which was used during construction of a second large-diameter reinforced concrete siphon alongside an existing siphon of similar proportions for water conveyance on a hydro project. Results of numerical modeling for the highway retaining wall are compared with measured data. For the spillway and the siphon structures, only numerical analyses are included, as these structures were not instrumented. Practical significance of the information included in the paper are: (a) both the structure and the soil on which it is founded form an integrated system that needs to be analyzed as such for meaningful results; (b) interfaces between the soil and structure, where separation and slip can occur, should be included in numerical modeling; and (c) sequence of construction starting with the initial excavation, and construction sequence including placement of the fill in lifts, should be simulated.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Author (DI Yu-hua)
2 CitationsSource
An in-soil version of the null soil pressure measurement system has been used in the measurement of lateral earth pressures of granular soils for at-rest Ko conditions. Four uniformly graded soils were tested, from particle diameter 0·15 mm through to 15 mm. Two significant observations were made based upon the data presented. For initial loading, the coefficient of lateral earth pressure, Ko, was found to be higher for soil placed in a dense packing arrangement in comparison to that measured fo...
13 CitationsSource
#1M.L. TalesnickH-Index: 1
#2H.-W. XiaH-Index: 1
Last. Ian D. MooreH-Index: 26
view all 3 authors...
An understanding of the stress distributions that act on buried pipes plays a key role in the development and use of design methods for these structures. The radial stresses that develop on buried flexible pipes have been investigated by a number of researchers through experimental, analytical and numerical methods. However, direct measurements of soil contact stresses acting on small-diameter pipes have not been possible, since commercial earth pressure cells are large, and the stiffness of the...
26 CitationsSource
#1Ashok K. Chugh (USBR: United States Bureau of Reclamation)H-Index: 7
#2Joseph F. Labuz (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 32
The field data of an instrumented cantilever retaining wall are reexamined to develop a working hypothesis for the mechanism that explains the observed response. The field data are in terms of earth pressures and wall movements (de- flection, translation, and rotation) from the start to completion of backfilling. The observed response demonstrates strong in- teraction between the retaining wall and foundation soil. Traditional calculations based on earth pressure coefficients had not provided a ...
10 CitationsSource
#1Ashok K. Chugh (USBR: United States Bureau of Reclamation)H-Index: 7
An existing reinforced concrete barrel of the Weber Branch Siphon and Weber Coulee Siphon along East Low Canal in the State of Washington, U.S.A. is used as an earth retaining structure during required excavation for construction of an additional cast-in-place reinforced concrete barrel in close proximity. A continuumbased numerical model is implemented to simulate significant construction stages in sequential order so that soil-structure interaction effects are considered. Results of the numeri...
1 CitationsSource
2 CitationsSource
#1Joseph G. Bentler (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 2
#2Joseph F. Labuz (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 32
Earth pressure cells, tiltmeters, strain gauges, inclinometer casings, and survey reflectors were installed during construction of a reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall. A data acquisition system with remote access monitored some 60 sensors on a continual basis. Analyses of the data indicated development of the active condition after translation of about 0.1% of the backfill height. The wall rotated into the backfill as a rigid body, but the top of the stem deflected away from the back...
18 CitationsSource
A procedure is presented to develop geometric dimensions and material property values for a model cantilever wall from those of a prototype counterfort wall such that the model wall will simulate the response of the prototype wall for seismic loads. The equivalency criteria are given. A sample problem is included to illustrate the use of the proposed procedure. Accuracy of results is discussed. Published in 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
5 CitationsSource
#1Joseph G. BentlerH-Index: 2
#2Joseph F. LabuzH-Index: 32
Last. Arturo E. SchultzH-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
Earth pressure cells, tiltmeters, strain gages, inclinometer casings, and survey reflectors were installed in fall 2002 during construction of a 26-ft (7.9-m) high Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall. A data acquisition system with remote access monitored some 60 sensors on a continual basis. Analyses of the data indicated the development of active earth pressure at the end of backfilling, with a resultant at about one-third of the backfi...
5 Citations
#1Robert M. EbelingH-Index: 2
#2Ernest E. MorrisonH-Index: 2
Abstract : This technical report deals with the soil mechanics aspects of the design of waterfront retaining structures built to withstand the effects of earthquake loadings. It addresses the stability and movement of gravity retaining walls and anchored sheet pile walls, and the dynamic forces against the walls of drydocks and U-frame locks. The effects of wall displacements, submergence, liquefaction potential, and excess pore water pressures, as well as inertial and hydrodynamic forces, are i...
69 Citations
Cited By2
#1G. SrideviH-Index: 2
Last. Gouda SudarshanH-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...