Improving the usefulness and practice of evidence synthesis: views and experiences of public health decision makers and review authors in the UK
Abstract
BackgroundThe preparation of rigorous systematic reviews to address public health policy questions presents various methodological challenges. The Cochrane Public Health Group conducted a consultation that aimed to explore the usefulness of public health systematic reviews, and key issues hindering timely production of useful, policy relevant reviews.MethodsWe purposively sampled users of reviews, commissioners, and authors with diverse...
Paper Details
Title
Improving the usefulness and practice of evidence synthesis: views and experiences of public health decision makers and review authors in the UK
Published Date
Nov 1, 2014
Journal
Volume
384
Pages
S81 - S81
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History