Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.

Published on Oct 21, 2014in PLOS Medicine11.069
· DOI :10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001745
Katy B. Kozhimannil33
Estimated H-index: 33
(UMN: University of Minnesota),
Mariana C. Arcaya19
Estimated H-index: 19
(Harvard University),
Subbaya Subramanian51
Estimated H-index: 51
(Harvard University)
Background: Cesarean delivery is the most common inpatient surgery in the United States, where 1.3 million cesarean sections occur annually, and rates vary widely by hospital. Identifying sources of variation in cesarean use is crucial to improving the consistency and quality of obstetric care. We used hospital discharge records to examine the extent to which variability in the likelihood of cesarean section across US hospitals was attributable to individual women’s clinical diagnoses. Methods and Findings: Using data from the 2009 and 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project—a 20% sample of US hospitals—we analyzed data for 1,475,457 births in 1,373 hospitals. We fitted multilevel logistic regression models (patients nested in hospitals). The outcome was cesarean (versus vaginal) delivery. Covariates included diagnosis of diabetes in pregnancy, hypertension in pregnancy, hemorrhage during pregnancy or placental complications, fetal distress, and fetal disproportion or obstructed labor; maternal age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status; and hospital size and location/teaching status. The cesarean section prevalence was 22.0% (95% confidence interval 22.0% to 22.1%) among women with no prior cesareans. In unadjusted models, the between-hospital variation in the individual risk of primary cesarean section was 0.14 (95% credible interval 0.12 to 0.15). The difference in the probability of having a cesarean delivery between hospitals was 25 percentage points. Hospital variability did not decrease after adjusting for patient diagnoses, socio-demographics, and hospital characteristics (0.16 [95% credible interval 0.14 to 0.18]). A limitation is that these data, while nationally representative, did not contain information on parity or gestational age. Conclusions: Variability across hospitals in the individual risk of cesarean section is not decreased by accounting for differences in maternal diagnoses. These findings highlight the need for more comprehensive or linked data including parity and gestational age as well as examination of other factors—such as hospital policies, practices, and culture—in determining cesarean section use. Please see later in the article for the Editors’ Summary.
Figures & Tables
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
: In 2011, one in three women who gave birth in the United States did so by cesarean delivery. Cesarean birth can be life-saving for the fetus, the mother, or both in certain cases. However, the rapid increase in cesarean birth rates from 1996 to 2011 without clear evidence of concomitant decreases in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. Variation in the rates of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean births also indica...
#1Ashley N. CoralloH-Index: 1
#2Ruth CroxfordH-Index: 41
Last. Therese A. Stukel (The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice)H-Index: 85
view all 6 authors...
Major variations in medical practice have been documented internationally. Variations raise questions about the quality, equity, and efficiency of resource allocation and use, and have important implications for health care and health policy.
#1Joyce A MartinH-Index: 67
#2Brady E HamiltonH-Index: 50
Last. T J MatthewsH-Index: 9
view all 5 authors...
Objectives—This report presents 2012 data on U.S. births according to a wide variety of characteristics. Data are presented for maternal age, live-birth order, race and Hispanic origin, marital status, attendant at birth, method of delivery, period of gestation, birthweight, and plurality. Birth and fertility rates are presented by age, live-birth order, race and Hispanic origin, and marital status. Selected data by mother’s state of residence and birth rates by age and race of father also are s...
#1Cathy Schoen (Commonwealth Fund)H-Index: 37
#2Robin Osborn (Commonwealth Fund)H-Index: 23
Last. Michelle M. Doty (Commonwealth Fund)H-Index: 35
view all 4 authors...
The United States is in the midst of the most sweeping health insurance expansions and market reforms since the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. Our 2013 survey of the general population in eleven countries—Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States—found that US adults were significantly more likely than their counterparts in other countries to forgo care because of cost, to have difficulty ...
#1Michelle J K Osterman (CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)H-Index: 31
#2Joyce A MartinH-Index: 67
KEY FINDINGS: Data from the natality data file, national vital statistics system. After 12 years of consecutive increases, the preliminary cesarean delivery rate among singleton births was unchanged from 2009 to 2011 (31.3%). Cesarean delivery rates decreased more than 5% among births at 38 weeks of gestation, but increased 4% among births at 39 weeks. Decreases in cesarean delivery rates for births at 38 weeks occurred for non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic women, as well as f...
Childbirth is the leading reason for hospitalization in the United States, and maternity related expenditures are substantial for many health insurance programs, including Medicaid. We studied the relationship between primary payer and trends in hospital-based childbirth care.Retrospective analysis of hospital discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, a 20% stratified sample of US hospitals.Data on 6,717,486 hospital-based births fo...
Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide. The appropriate caesarean section rate remains a topic of debate among women and professionals. Evidence-based medicine has not provided an answer and depends on interpretation of the literature. Overall caesarean section rates are unhelpful, and caesarean section rates should not be judged in isolation from other outcomes and epidemiological characteristics. Better understanding of caesarean section rates, their consequences and their bene...
#1Isabel A. Cáceres (Massachusetts Department of Public Health)H-Index: 1
#2Mariana C. Arcaya (Harvard University)H-Index: 19
Last. S. V. Subramanian (Harvard University)H-Index: 83
view all 9 authors...
Objective We examined the extent to which differences in hospital-level cesarean delivery rates in Massachusetts were attributable to hospital-level, rather than maternal, characteristics. Methods Birth certificate and maternal in-patient hospital discharge records for 2004–06 in Massachusetts were linked. The study population was nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex births (NTSV) (n = 80,371) in 49 hospitals. Covariates included mother's age, race/ethnicity, education, infant birth weight, ...
Objectives. We compared childbirth-related outcomes for Medicaid recipients who received prenatal education and childbirth support from trained doulas with outcomes from a national sample of similar women and estimated potential cost savings.Methods. We calculated descriptive statistics for Medicaid-funded births nationally (from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample; n = 279 008) and births supported by doula care (n = 1079) in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in 2010 to 2012; used multivariate regressio...
#1Katy B. Kozhimannil (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 33
#2Michael R. Law (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 24
Last. Beth A Virnig (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 66
view all 3 authors...
Cesarean delivery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States, and cesarean rates are increasing. Working with 2009 data from 593 US hospitals nationwide, we found that cesarean rates varied tenfold across hospitals, from 7.1 percent to 69.9 percent. Even for women with lower-risk pregnancies, in which more limited variation might be expected, cesarean rates varied fifteenfold, from 2.4 percent to 36.5 percent. Thus, vast differences in practice patterns are likely to ...
Cited By54
#1Afsoon Ghafari-Saravi (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)
#2Sarina Chaiken (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)
Last. Aaron B. Caughey (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)H-Index: 95
view all 6 authors...
Cesarean delivery rates continue to remain high despite recent attempts to decrease these rates. Prior data suggest that there is great variation in cesarean rates by hospital.The intent of this st...
Cesarean births have increased in the United States, accounting for approximately one-third of all births. There is concern that cesarean birth is overused, due to the wide variation in rates geographically and at different institutions within the same region. Despite the rising rate, there has not been an improvement in maternal or neonatal outcomes. Consequently, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine published recommendations aimed ...
#1Lisa D. Levine (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 15
#2Katheryne DownesH-Index: 27
Last. Sindhu K. Srinivas (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 25
view all 4 authors...
AbstractObjective: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a standardized induction protocol on reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity in women undergoing an induction with an unfavorable cer...
#5Loreen Gilmour (U of C: University of Calgary)H-Index: 4
#7R. Douglas Wilson (U of C: University of Calgary)H-Index: 11
BACKGROUND Cesarean birth (CB) is the most common inpatient surgical procedure, and until recently, there were no internationally accepted, standardized clinical guidelines available. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS® ) program aims to improve outcomes through the development of international guidelines (IGs). As an ERAS IG for CB was being developed, this qualitative study was conducted to explore and consolidate women's experiences with CB. METHODS Qualitative methods were used to ass...
#1Janne Mannseth (University of Bergen)H-Index: 3
#2Geir Drage Berentsen (NHH: Norwegian School of Economics)H-Index: 4
Last. Dag Moster (University of Bergen)H-Index: 23
view all 5 authors...
AIMS Caesarean section (CS) is a medical intervention performed in Norway when a surgical delivery is considered more beneficial than a vaginal. Because deliveries with higher risk are centralized to larger hospitals, use of CS varies considerably between hospitals. We describe how the use of CS varies geographically by municipality. Since indications for CS should have little variation across the relatively homogenous population of Norway, we expect fair use of CS to be evenly distributed acros...
#1Hwa Young Lee (Harvard University)H-Index: 9
#2Rockli Kim (College of Health Sciences, Bahrain)H-Index: 15
Last. Sankaran Subramanian (Philippine Institute for Development Studies)H-Index: 82
view all 4 authors...
Background Prevalence of Cesarean section (C-section) is unequally distributed. Since both extremely low and high levels of C-section can not only cause adverse birth outcomes but also impose a double burden of inefficiency within maternal health care, it is important to monitor the dynamics of key factors associated with the use of C-section. Objectives To examine the association between type of provider and C-section in India in three-time points: 1999, 2006, and 2016, and also to assess wheth...
#1Maria Andrikopoulou (Columbia University)H-Index: 8
#2Timothy Wen (Columbia University)H-Index: 15
Last. Alexander M. Friedman (Columbia University)H-Index: 29
view all 9 authors...
OBJECTIVE To characterize medical, obstetric, and demographic risk factors associated with nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth. STUDY DESIGN Cross sectional study. SETTING United States delivery hospitalizations. POPULATION NTSV births in 2016-2018 US natality data. METHODS This study analyzed a national sample of natality data generated by the United States National Vital Statistics System. NTSV deliveries were identified. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Risk fact...
OBJECTIVE: To develop a validated model to predict intrapartum cesarean in nulliparous women and to use it to adjust for case-mix when comparing institutional laboring cesarean birth (CB) rates. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter retrospective study used chart-abstracted data on nulliparous, singleton, term births over a 7-year period. Prelabor cesareans were excluded. Logistic regression was used to predict the probability of CB for individual pregnancies. Thirty-five potential predictive variables...
#1Rebecca R S Clark (Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics)H-Index: 1
#2Eileen T. Lake (Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics)H-Index: 33
Background Birth is the most common reason for hospitalization in the United States. Hospital variation in maternal outcomes is an important indicator of health care quality. Spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB) is the most optimal birth outcome for the majority of mothers and newborns. The purpose of this study was to examine hospital-level variation in SVB overall and among low-risk women in a four-state sample representing 25% of births in the United States in 2016. Methods Women giving birth in C...
#1Karina Biaggio Soares (UFSM: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria)H-Index: 1
#2Vanessa Klein (UFSM: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria)H-Index: 3
Last. Cristine Kolling Konopka (UFSM: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria)H-Index: 4
view all 6 authors...
Objective To analyze and compare the frequency of cesarean sections and vaginal deliveries through the Robson Classification in pregnant women attended at a tertiary hospital in two different periods. Methods Cross-sectional, retrospective study of birth records, comprising 4,010 women, conducted from January 2014 to December 2015 in the only public regional referral hospital for the care of high- risk pregnancies, located in Southern Brazil. Results The overall cesarean section rate reached 57....
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.