Authors’ response—Risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules: a validation study of four prediction models
Abstract
We thank Perandini et al. for their comments regarding our recently published data and the interest they have shown in our work [ 1 Parandini S. Soardi G. Motton M. et al. Critique of Al-Ameri et al. (2015)—Risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules: a validation study of four prediction models. Lung Cancer. 2015; (June 03)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.05.015 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (9) Google Scholar , 2 Al-Ameri A....
Paper Details
Title
Authors’ response—Risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules: a validation study of four prediction models
Published Date
Oct 1, 2015
Journal
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
119 - 120
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History