Review paper
Does Shared Decision Making in Cancer Treatment Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
The growing consensus espousing the use of shared decision making (SDM) in cancer treatment has coincided with the rise of health care evaluation paradigms that emphasize quality of life (QOL) as a central outcome measure. This review systematically examines the association between treatment SDM and QOL outcomes in cancer.A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. The search retrieved 16,726 records, which were...
Paper Details
Title
Does Shared Decision Making in Cancer Treatment Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Literature Review
Published Date
Aug 5, 2015
Journal
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1037 - 1048
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History