Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews

Volume: 68, Issue: 11, Pages: 1282 - 1291
Published: Nov 1, 2015
Abstract
Objectives To investigate how often systematic reviewers encounter multiple trial effect estimates that are available for inclusion in a particular meta-analysis (multiplicity of results) and the methods they use to select effect estimates. Study Design and Setting We randomly sampled Cochrane and MEDLINE-indexed non-Cochrane reviews published between January 2010 and January 2012. The first presented meta-analysis of an effect measure for a...
Paper Details
Title
Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews
Published Date
Nov 1, 2015
Volume
68
Issue
11
Pages
1282 - 1291
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.