Original paper
Repeatability of Automated Perimetry: A Comparison between Standard Automated Perimetry with Stimulus Size III and V, Matrix, and Motion Perimetry
Volume: 50, Issue: 2, Pages: 974 - 974
Published: Feb 1, 2009
Abstract
purpose. Standard automated perimetry (SAP) shows a marked increase in variability in damaged areas of the visual field. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that larger stimuli are associated with more uniform variability, by investigating the retest variability of four perimetry tests: standard automated perimetry size III (SAP III), with the SITA standard strategy; SAP size V (SAP V), with the full-threshold strategy; Matrix (FDT...
Paper Details
Title
Repeatability of Automated Perimetry: A Comparison between Standard Automated Perimetry with Stimulus Size III and V, Matrix, and Motion Perimetry
Published Date
Feb 1, 2009
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
974 - 974
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History