Review paper
Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
Abstract
To investigate how consensus is operationalized in Delphi studies and to explore the role of consensus in determining the results of these studies.Systematic review of a random sample of 100 English language Delphi studies, from two large multidisciplinary databases [ISI Web of Science (Thompson Reuters, New York, NY) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL)], published between 2000 and 2009.About 98 of the Delphi studies purported to assess...
Paper Details
Title
Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
Published Date
Apr 1, 2014
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
401 - 409
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History