Ellipse

Algorithm

Engineering

Aerospace engineering

Statistics

Aerodynamics

Balance (ability)

Systems engineering

Computer science

Eyes open

Environmental health

Simulation

Task (project management)

Mathematics

Population

Force platform

Center of pressure (fluid mechanics)

Artificial intelligence

Geometry

Confidence interval

Medicine

Standard deviation

Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Machine learning

Physiological Reports

Postural control is often quantified by recording the trajectory of the center of pressure (COP)—also called stabilogram—during human quiet standing. This quantification has many important applications, such as the early detection of balance degradation to prevent falls, a crucial task whose relevance increases with the aging of the population. Due to the complexity of the quantification process, the analyses of sway patterns have been performed empirically using a number of variables, such as ellipse confidence area or mean velocity. This study reviews and compares a wide range of state-of-the-art variables that are used to assess the risk of fall in elderly from a stabilogram. When appropriate, we discuss the hypothesis and mathematical assumptions that underlie these variables, and we propose a reproducible method to compute each of them. Additionally, we provide a statistical description of their behavior on two datasets recorded in two elderly populations and with different protocols, to hint at typical values of these variables. First, the balance of 133 elderly individuals, including 32 fallers, was measured on a relatively inexpensive, portable force platform (Wii Balance Board, Nintendo) with a 25-s open-eyes protocol. Second, the recordings of 76 elderly individuals, from an open access database commonly used to test static balance analyses, were used to compute the values of the variables on 60-s eyes-open recordings with a research laboratory standard force platform.

A review of center of pressure (COP) variables to quantify standing balance in elderly people: Algorithms and open‐access code*