Choosing clinically interpretable summary measures and robust analytic procedures for quantifying the treatment difference in comparative clinical studies
Abstract
The data that support the findings of the study in Section 2 are openly available in Goldman et al.7 at https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2015301. The data that support the findings of the study in Section 3 are openly available in Hellmann et al.15 at https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1910231 and Guyot et al.16 at http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-9. The data that support the findings of the study in Section 4 are not publicly...
Paper Details
Title
Choosing clinically interpretable summary measures and robust analytic procedures for quantifying the treatment difference in comparative clinical studies
Published Date
Nov 16, 2021
Journal
Volume
40
Issue
28
Pages
6235 - 6242
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History