Quantum mechanics

Biology

Actuarial science

Statistics

Financial literacy

Pedagogy

Literacy

Economics

Power (physics)

Computer science

Psychometrics

Paleontology

Physics

Test (biology)

Psychology

Mathematics

Exploratory research

Econometrics

Sociology

Reliability (semiconductor)

Artificial intelligence

Geometry

Clinical psychology

Finance

Consistency (knowledge bases)

Internal consistency

Social science

Journal of Consumer Affairs

Financial literacy is often measured with only three to five questions, suggesting challenges with achieving respectable levels of internal consistency reliability. Based on our review, we found financial literacy tests composed of three and five test questions yielded mean reliability estimates of 0.40 ( k = 7; N = 167,075) and 0.54 ( k = 8; N = 57,937), respectively: values less than minimally acceptable for even exploratory research. Based on our more comprehensive review of 52 samples and a variety of financial literacy tests (3–45 questions), researchers are recommended to measure financial literacy with a minimum of 13–15 questions. Finally, we conclude that the potential impact of financial literacy on various outcome variables has been underestimated substantially in many previous investigations, as the relatively low levels of internal consistency reliability in the financial literacy test scores attenuated the obtained effects estimated from the observed scores.

Measurement error in research on financial literacy: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?