Original paper
Comparing Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow: Interventions, Individual Differences, and Rules
Abstract
Research on judgment and decision making has suggested that the System 2 process of ‘thinking slow’ can help people to improve their decision making by reducing well-established statistical decision biases (including base rate neglect, probability matching, and the conjunction fallacy). In a large (N = 1709) pre-registered study, we compare the effects of individual differences and behavioral interventions to test the relative benefits of...
Paper Details
Title
Comparing Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow: Interventions, Individual Differences, and Rules
Published Date
Aug 1, 2020
Volume
2020
Issue
1
Pages
21638 - 21638
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History