How do prostate cancer patients navigate the active surveillance journey? A 3-year longitudinal study.

Published on Feb 1, 2021in Supportive Care in Cancer2.635
· DOI :10.1007/S00520-020-05524-8
Paola Dordoni2
Estimated H-index: 2
,
Paola Dordoni6
Estimated H-index: 6
+ 8 AuthorsLara Bellardita10
Estimated H-index: 10
Sources
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether prostate cancer (PCa) patients' coping strategies (i.e., fighting spirit, anxious preoccupation, fatalism, helplessness/hopelessness, and avoidance) significantly change during the first 3-year follow-up period of active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether, 104 patients on AS completed the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) at baseline (T0), at 10 and 12 months after diagnostic biopsy (T1 and T2, respectively) and then at 24- (T3) and 36-month (T4) follow-up. Paired samples T test was used to detect statistically significant changes over time. Changes ≥ 1 point (or ≤ - 1) were hypothesized to be clinically relevant. RESULTS: During the first 3 years on AS, men experienced decreased anxiety, avoidance thoughts/behaviors, and fight-against-cancer attitudes, and these changes were found to be statistically significant. When considering clinically significant changes between inclusion in AS (T0) and 3-year follow-up (T4), avoidance decreased in 19% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were observed to have adopted functional coping strategies at baseline, which were maintained through the first 3 years on AS. Overall, men on AS may perceive increasing control over their cancer and comfort with the AS protocol over time and experience slight decreases in anxious preoccupation, cancer-related avoidance thoughts and behaviors, and fight-against-cancer reactions. For those men who find it difficult to cope with AS, psychological monitoring and interventions could be helpful throughout the monitoring journey.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
7 Citations
4 Citations
3 Citations
References36
Newest
#1Christopher F. Sharpley (UNE: University of New England (Australia))H-Index: 34
#2Vicki Bitsika (Bond University)H-Index: 19
Last. David Christie (UNE: University of New England (Australia))H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
: The objective of the current study was to identify the patient-perceived "worst aspects" of their diagnostic and treatment processes for prostate cancer (PCa) so as to inform targeted interventions aimed at reducing patient anxiety and depression. Two hundred and fifty-two patients who had received their diagnoses less than 8 years ago answered a postal survey about (a) background information, (b) their own descriptions of the worst aspects of their diagnosis and treatment, and (c) their ratin...
3 CitationsSource
#1Lionne D. F. Venderbos (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 10
#2Stephanie D. Brandhof (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 1
Last. Ida J. Korfage (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 36
view all 3 authors...
Men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) can choose between various medically acceptable treatment options which are similar in terms of survival rates but different in terms of types and rates of side effects. Choosing a treatment therefore has become a preference-sensitive decision for which shared decision-making may be used. In this chapter, we aim to summarize quality of life effects of the various treatment options to inform both patients and their families and healthcare provider...
1 CitationsSource
#1Mari Lashbrook (QIMR: QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute)H-Index: 3
#2Patricia C. Valery (CDU: Charles Darwin University)H-Index: 34
Last. Christina M. BernardesH-Index: 6
view all 5 authors...
BACKGROUND: Individual coping strategies are a fundamental element underpinning psychosocial distress. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe coping strategies and their measurement used by survivors of breast, prostate, and/or colorectal cancer after treatment. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) was conducted from January 1980 to March 2015. Data were extracted using standardized forms and included studies that explored the coping mechanisms of su...
21 CitationsSource
#1C. MarenghiH-Index: 6
Last. Riccardo Valdagni (University of Milan)H-Index: 51
view all 34 authors...
PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of active surveillance (AS) on patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and to identify predictors of disease reclassification.MethodsIn 2005, we defined an inst...
11 CitationsSource
#1Emily M Mader (State University of New York Upstate Medical University)H-Index: 10
#2Hsin H. Li (State University of New York Upstate Medical University)H-Index: 2
Last. Telisa Stewart (State University of New York Upstate Medical University)H-Index: 6
view all 12 authors...
Abstract Background Active surveillance is a management strategy for men diagnosed with early-stage, low-risk prostate cancer in which their cancer is monitored and treatment is delayed. This study investigated the primary coping mechanisms for men following the active surveillance treatment plan, with a specific focus on how these men interact with their social network as they negotiate the stress and uncertainty of their diagnosis and treatment approach. Methods Thematic analysis of semi-struc...
11 CitationsSource
#1Lionne D. F. Venderbos (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 10
#2Shafak Aluwini (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 5
Last. Ida J. Korfage (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 36
view all 7 authors...
Purpose To compare long-term (4–10 years) quality of life (QoL) of men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated by different modalities and a reference group without PCa.
17 CitationsSource
#1Silvia VillaH-Index: 6
#2Friederike KendelH-Index: 16
Last. Lara BellarditaH-Index: 10
view all 19 authors...
Abstract Background Literature on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS) shows a need for methodological guidance regarding HRQoL issues and how to address them. Objective The European School of Oncology Task Force (ESO TF) aimed to identify a core set of research questions and related measures to include in AS HRQoL studies. Design, setting, and participants A modified Delphi study was used to reach consensus on AS HRQ...
8 CitationsSource
#1James Arthur Kuzman (HCI: Huntsman Cancer Institute)H-Index: 2
#2David D. Stenehjem (UofU: University of Utah)H-Index: 13
Last. Neeraj Agarwal (HCI: Huntsman Cancer Institute)H-Index: 61
view all 10 authors...
Immunotherapy with high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL2) results in long-term survival in some metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients but has significant acute toxicities. Biomarkers predicting response to therapy are needed to better select patients most likely to benefit. NLR (absolute neutrophil count (ANC)/absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)) is a prognostic and predicative biomarker in various malignancies. The goal was to determine whether NLR can predict response to HD-IL2 in this setting...
31 CitationsSource
#1Leonard P. Bokhorst (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 12
#2Riccardo ValdagniH-Index: 51
Last. Monique J. Roobol (Erasmus University Medical Center)H-Index: 76
view all 7 authors...
Abstract Background The Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study was initiated a decade ago to study the most optimal selection and follow-up of men on active surveillance (AS). Objective We report on 10 yr of follow-up of men on AS in the PRIAS study and evaluate if criteria used to recommend a switch to active treatment truly predict unfavorable outcome on subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP). Design, setting, and participants Men with low-risk prostate cancer ...
202 CitationsSource
#1Sophie Bruinsma (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 13
#2Chris H. Bangma (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 78
Last. Monique J. Roobol (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 76
view all 9 authors...
In the past decade active surveillance (AS) of men with localized prostate cancer has become an increasingly popular management option, and a range of clinical guidelines have been published on this topic. Existing guidelines regarding AS for prostate cancer vary widely, but predominantly state that the most suitable patients for AS are those with pretreatment clinical stage T1c or T2 tumours, serum PSA levels <10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason scores of 6 or less, a maximum of one or two tumour-positive...
99 CitationsSource
Cited By3
Newest
2 CitationsSource
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the fifth cause of tumor-related deaths in man worldwide. Despite the considerable improvement in the clinical management of PCa, several limitations emerged both in the screening for early diagnosis and in the medical treatment. The use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening resulted in patients’ overtreatment and the standard therapy of patients suffering from locally advanced/metastatic tumors (e.g., radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and androgen depriv...
2 CitationsSource
Background The psychological burden possibly deriving from not immediately undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) could be a potential disadvantage of active surveillance (AS), especially in the eve of some relevant clinical exams [i.e., re-biopsy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, and medical examination]. Even if it is known from the literature that the majority of PCa men in AS do not report heightened anxiety, there is a minority of patients who show clinically significan...
Source