Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments
Abstract
When individuals have questions about scientific issues, they often search the Internet. Evaluating sources of information and claims they find has become more difficult in the post-truth era. Students are often taught source evaluation techniques, but the proliferation of “fake news” has resulted in a misinformation arms race. As searchers get more sophisticated identifying misleading information, so do purveyors of information who intend to...
Paper Details
Title
Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments
Published Date
Mar 26, 2020
Journal
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
120 - 131
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History