Quality (philosophy)

Process (computing)

Engineering

Philosophy

Operating system

Computer science

Management science

Systematic review

Psychology

Political science

Epistemology

Sociology

Framing (construction)

MEDLINE

Structural engineering

Engineering ethics

Review of Educational Research

The purpose of this article is to overview various challenges that prospective authors of quality systematic reviews should be prepared to address. These challenges pertain to all phases of the review process: from posing a critical question worthy of pursuit and executing a search procedure that is appropriately framed and transparently recorded, to discerning patterns and trends within the resulting data that speak directly to the critical question framing the review. For each of these challenges, suggestions are offered as to how authors might respond so as to enhance the quality of the review process and increase the value of findings for educational research, practice, and policymaking.

Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews