Passion

Mathematics education

Engineering

Philosophy

Social psychology

Face (sociological concept)

Pedagogy

Empirical evidence

Career development

Empirical research

Systematic review

Mechanical engineering

Proactivity

Psychology

Political science

Work (physics)

Epistemology

Sociology

Work–life balance

MEDLINE

Engineering ethics

Social science

Human Resource Development Quarterly

This article offers a systematic review and synthesis of 28 empirical studies exploring the career experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Three central questions guided this review, and findings show that theoretically, women's career experiences are mostly studied from behavioral and organizational perspectives. Methodologically, a balanced approach (both quantitative and qualitative) was adopted in these the studies. The empirical evidence suggests that STEM women's career experiences are largely shaped by their own personal characteristics (motivation, self‐efficacy, and passion) and influenced by their parents, male colleagues, and human resources (HR) practices. Meanwhile, STEM women continue to face a myriad of challenges in a predominantly masculine environment (gendered organizational culture, gender‐based stereotypes, struggle with work‐life balance, and lack of mentors). To cope with these challenges, STEM women in the reviewed studies use three types of strategies—conforming, impression management, and proactivity. Based on our review, we derive implications for theory and practice, as well as an agenda for future research.

Career experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A systematic literature review