Crazy-Funny-Cool Theory: Divergent Reactions to Unusual Product Designs

Published on Sep 9, 2019in Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
路 DOI :10.1086/705036
Caleb Warren12
Estimated H-index: 12
,
Martin Reimann19
Estimated H-index: 19
Sources
Abstract
AbstractConsumer research suggests that cool products demonstrate autonomy by diverging from the norm. However, many products that diverge from the norm seem funny or simply bad rather than cool. What distinguishes products that look cool from those that look funny? We integrate prior research to propose a theory of how consumers respond to unusual product designs. Four experiments provide converging evidence that the design of cool products diverges from the norm in ways that make sense (i.e., seem appropriate), whereas the design of humorous products diverges in ways that do not make sense (i.e., seem violating). Results from a neuroimaging experiment support our psychometric findings by revealing that cool (vs. humorous) products are more likely to activate the anterior cingulate cortex. We discuss how coolness has the potential to transform society by rewarding products, brands, and people who figure out how to be different in a way that makes sense.
馃摉 Papers frequently viewed together
33 Citations
4 Citations
References0
Newest
Cited By4
Newest
Source
#1Caleb Warren (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 12
#2Adam Barsky (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 13
Last. A. Peter McGraw (CU: University of Colorado Boulder)H-Index: 30
view all 3 authors...
Despite the broad importance of humor, psychologists do not agree on the basic elements that cause people to experience laughter, amusement, and the perception that something is funny. There are mo...
2 CitationsSource
#1C. Clark Cao (Lingnan University)
#2Martin Reimann (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 19
This article reviews a wide range of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies conducted in the field of consumer neuroscience to (1) highlight common interpretative approaches of neuroimaging data (i.e., forward inference and reverse inference), (2) discuss potential interpretative issues associated with these approaches, and (3) provide a framework that employs a multi-method approach aimed to possibly raise the explanatory power and, thus, the validity of functional neuroimaging re...
Source
1 CitationsSource