Original paper
The impact of mindfulness and perceived importance of peer reporting on students’ response to peers’ academic dishonesty
Abstract
Drawing from existing knowledge of ethical decision-making and academic dishonesty, this study investigates factors that influence students’ decision to report the academic misconduct of their peers (i.e. peer reporting). The core of the proposed conceptual model consists of the succession of three steps, linking ethical recognition, ethical judgment and ethical intent related to peer reporting. We introduce mindfulness as an antecedent of...
Paper Details
Title
The impact of mindfulness and perceived importance of peer reporting on students’ response to peers’ academic dishonesty
Published Date
Jun 26, 2019
Journal
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
385 - 399
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History