Finance

Epistemology

Reflexivity

Variety (cybernetics)

Philosophy

Sociology

Business

Artificial intelligence

Psychology

Order (exchange)

Qualitative research

Geography

Data science

Popularity

Social science

Computer science

Cartography

Thematic analysis

Social psychology

Thematic map

Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health

Since initially writing on thematic analysis in 2006, the popularity of the method we outlined has exploded, the variety of TA approaches have expanded, and, not least, our thinking has developed and shifted. In this reflexive commentary, we look back at some of the unspoken assumptions that informed how we wrote our 2006 paper. We connect some of these un-identified assumptions, and developments in the method over the years, with some conceptual mismatches and confusions we see in published TA studies. In order to facilitate better TA practice, we reflect on how our thinking has evolved – and in some cases sedimented – since the publication of our 2006 paper, and clarify and revise some of the ways we phrased or conceptualised TA, and the elements of, and processes around, a method we now prefer to call reflexive TA.

Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis