Speaking on Data’s Behalf: What Researchers Say and How Audiences Choose
Abstract
Bayesian statistics have become popular in the social sciences, in part because they are thought to present more useful information than traditional frequentist statistics. Unfortunately, little is known about whether or how interpretations of frequentist and Bayesian results differ.We test whether presenting Bayesian or frequentist results based on the same underlying data influences the decisions people made.Participants were randomly assigned...
Paper Details
Title
Speaking on Data’s Behalf: What Researchers Say and How Audiences Choose
Published Date
Mar 13, 2019
Journal
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
325 - 353
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History