Original paper
Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation
Abstract
A random effects meta‐analysis combines the results of several independent studies to summarise the evidence about a particular measure of interest, such as a treatment effect. The approach allows for unexplained between‐study heterogeneity in the true treatment effect by incorporating random study effects about the overall mean. The variance of the mean effect estimate is conventionally calculated by assuming that the between study variance is...
Paper Details
Title
Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation
Published Date
Oct 7, 2016
Journal
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
301 - 317
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History