Engineering

Pedagogy

Psychology

Political science

Medicine

Medical education

Engineering ethics

Higher education

Studies in Higher Education

Research to date on the examination process for postgraduate research theses has focused largely on the deconstruction of examiners' reports. This article reports on a study of the processes that experienced examiners go through, and the judgements they make before writing their reports. A sample of 30 experienced examiners (dee ned as having examined the equivalent of at least e ve research theses over the last e ve years), from a range of disciplines in e ve universities was interviewed. Clear trends emerged with regard to: the criteria used by examiners and the levels of student performance expected by them; critical judgement points in the examination process; the examiners' perceptions of their own role in the process; the ine uence on examiners of previously published work, the views of the other examiner(s) and their knowledge of the student's supervisor and/or department, and the level of perceived responsibility between student and supervisor.

'It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize': How experienced examiners assess research theses