Review paper
The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation
Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 407 - 419
Published: Sep 14, 2015
Abstract
Nonhuman animal ("animal") experimentation is typically defended by arguments that it is reliable, that animals provide sufficiently good models of human biology and diseases to yield relevant information, and that, consequently, its use provides major human health benefits. I demonstrate that a growing body of scientific literature critically assessing the validity of animal experimentation generally (and animal modeling specifically) raises...
Paper Details
Title
The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation
Published Date
Sep 14, 2015
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
407 - 419
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History