Realism, Antirealism, and Conventionalism about Race

Published on Nov 25, 2014in Philosophy of Science1.317
· DOI :10.1086/678314
Jonathan Kaplan16
Estimated H-index: 16
 , Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther17
Estimated H-index: 17
Sources
Abstract
This paper distinguishes three concepts of “race”: bio-genomic cluster/race, biological race, and social race. We map out realism, antirealism, and conventionalism about each of these, in three important historical episodes: Frank Livingstone and Theodosius Dobzhansky in 1962, A. W. F. Edwards’s 2003 response to Lewontin’s 1972 paper, and contemporary discourse. Semantics is especially crucial to the first episode, while normativity is central to the second. Upon inspection, each episode also reveals a variety of commitments to the metaphysics of race. We conclude by interrogating the relevance of these scientific discussions for political positions and a post-racial future.
Download
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
200247.73Science
7 Authors (Noah A. Rosenberg, ..., Marcus W. Feldman)
20034.34BioEssays
1 Author (A. W. F. Edwards)
20132.89Biological Theory
2 Authors (Jonathan Kaplan, Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther)
References54
Newest
Race has been a longstanding topic in the biology textbook curriculum. Yet, there appears to be no research investigating whether the treatment of race in modern biology textbooks impacts how students conceptualize race. In the present study, a double-blind field experiment employing mixed-methods is used to investigate the impact of textbook-based genetics learning on essentialist conceptions of race amongst adolescents. The study was carried out in an eighth grade classroom in a California Bay...
Source
#1Nicholas WadeH-Index: 7
We reject a widespread objectivism about kinds of evolutionary groups in favor of a new conventionalism. Surprisingly, being any one kind of evolutionary group typically depends on which of many incompatible values are taken by suppressed variables. This novel pluralism underlies almost any single evolutionary group concept, unlike familiar pluralisms claiming that multiple concepts of certain sorts are legitimate. Consequently, we must help objective facts determine which candidate evolutionary...
Source
All eyes are turned towards genomic data and models as the source of knowledge about whether human races exist or not. Will genomic science make the final decision about whether racial realism (e.g. racial population naturalism) or anti-realism (e.g. racial scepticism) is correct? We think not. The results of even our best and most impressive genomic technologies underdetermine whether biogenomic races exist, or not. First, different sub-disciplines of biology interested in population structure ...
Source
In his criticism of my paper on the concept of race (Sesardic, 2010), Adam Hochman raises many issues that deserve further clarification. First, I will comment on Hochman’s claim that I attack a straw man version of racial constructionism. Second, I will try to correct what I see as a distorted historical picture of the debate between racial naturalists and racial constructionist s. Third, I will point out the main weaknesses in Hochman’s own defense of constructioni sm about race. And fourth, I...
Source
In Kaplan and Winther’s recent article (Biol Theory. doi: 10.1007/s13752-012-0048-0, 2012) they argue for three bold theses: first, that “it is illegitimate to read any ontology about ‘race’ off of biological theory or data”; second, that “using biological theory to ground race is a pernicious reification”; and, third, that “race is fundamentally a social rather than a biological category.” While Kaplan and Winther’s theses are thoughtful, I show that the arguments that their theses rest on are ...
Source
Jun 1, 2013·Biological Theory2.89
#1Jonathan Kaplan (OSU: Oregon State University)H-Index: 16
#2Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (UC: University of California)H-Index: 17
It is illegitimate to read any ontology about “race” off of biological theory or data. Indeed, the technical meaning of “genetic variation” is fluid, and there is no single theoretical agreed-upon criterion for defining and distinguishing populations given a particular set of genetic variation data. By analyzing three formal senses of “genetic variation,” viz., diversity, differentiation, and heterozygosity, we argue that the use of biological theory for making claims about race inevitably amoun...
Source
Jun 1, 2013·The Journal of Philosophy
#1Adam Hochman (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 8
Source
Jun 1, 2012·Philosophical Studies
#1Quayshawn Spencer (USF: University of San Francisco)H-Index: 7
A curious ambiguity has arisen in the race debate in recent years. That ambiguity is what is actually meant by ‘biological racial realism’. Some philosophers mean that ‘race is a natural kind in biology’, while others mean that ‘race is a real biological kind’. However, there is no agreement about what a natural kind or a real biological kind should be in the race debate. In this article, I will argue that the best interpretation of ‘biological racial realism’ is one that interprets ‘biological ...
Source
Jan 21, 2012·Journal of Theoretical Biology2.69
#1Omri Tal (TAU: Tel Aviv University)H-Index: 5
The cumulative effect of markers on classification accuracy, with even slight between-population allele frequency differences, has been a mainstay of empirical genetic research. The simple theoretical model of Edwards (2003) has enabled a clear elucidation of the effect of additional markers on average classification error. The present paper describes a mathematical generalization necessary to alleviate an oversimplification, but at the same time revealing an inherent drawback of the simple mode...
Source
123456
Cited By22
Newest
Aug 26, 2021·Metaphilosophy
#1Anthony F. Peressini (Marquette University)H-Index: 6
Source
Aug 16, 2021·Biological Journal of The Linnean Society2.14
#1Thomas A. C. Reydon (Leibniz University of Hanover)H-Index: 15
#2Werner Kunz (HHU: University of Düsseldorf)H-Index: 29
Source
Aug 1, 2020·Biology and Philosophy1.46
#1Kalewold Hailu Kalewold (UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)H-Index: 1
Racial disparities in health outcomes have recently become a flashpoint in the debate about the value of race as a biological concept. What role, if any, race has in the etiology of disease is a philosophically and scientifically contested topic. In this article, I expand on the insights of the new mechanistic philosophy of science to defend a mechanism discovery approach to investigating epidemiological racial disparities. The mechanism discovery approach has explanatory virtues lacking in the ...
Source
Nov 20, 2019·Journal of Social Ontology
#1Riin Kõiv (UT: University of Tartu)H-Index: 1
Source
Jul 1, 2019·Evolution: Education and Outreach
#1Heather L. Norton (UC: University of Cincinnati)H-Index: 16
#2Ellen E. Quillen (Wake Forest University)H-Index: 12
Last. Holly M. Dunsworth (URI: University of Rhode Island)H-Index: 11
view all 5 authors...
In 1956, evolutionary biologist J.B.S. Haldane posed a question to anthropologists: “Are the biological differences between human groups comparable with those between groups of domestic animals such as greyhounds and bulldogs…?” It reads as if it were posted on social media today. The analogy comparing human races to dog breeds is not only widespread in history and pop culture, but also sounds like scientific justification for eschewing the social construction of race, or for holding racist beli...
Source
In a large and impressive body of published work, Quayshawn Spencer has meticulously articulated and defended a metaphysical project aimed at resuscitating a biological conception of race—one free from many of the pitfalls of biological essentialism. If successful, such a project would be highly rewarding, since it would provide a compelling response to philosophers who have denied the genuine existence of race while avoiding the very dangers that they sought to avoid. I argue that if a “new bio...
#1Christopher M. Stojanowski (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 21
Social media is awash with the latest discoveries about the human past. Headlines read: “DNA of ancient skeleton linked to modern indigenous peoples,” “Ancient DNA suggests the first Americans sidestepped the glaciers,” and “Ancient DNA reveals secrets of human history.” These headlines all come from respected outlets with a connection to the academic community (Smithsonian, Science, and Nature, respectively). However, news media outlets with a more popular audience have also become interested i...
Source
This study explored Korean medical students’ perceptions of race from three perspectives: the definition of race, its biological reality, and the practical use of race information in medicine. Using three open-ended survey questions, we collected data from 506 Korean medical students. The data were analyzed through constant comparative analysis. We found diverse perceptions of race held by the students, which were similar to racial concepts that have emerged throughout the history of science. In...
Source
#1Mark Alfano (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 17
#2Holden Lr (Princeton University)H-Index: 1
Last. Andrew R. A. Conway (CGU: Claremont Graduate University)H-Index: 37
view all 3 authors...
Source
Abstract Neven Sesardic has recently defended his arguments in favour of racial naturalism—the view that race is a valid biological category—in response to my criticism of his work. While Sesardic claims that a strong version of racial naturalism can survive critique, he has in fact weakened his position considerably. He concedes that conventional racial taxonomy is arbitrary and he no longer identifies ‘races’ as human subspecies. Sesardic now relies almost entirely on Theodosius Dobzhansky's n...
Source
12
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.