Sparsely sampled MR navigators as a practical tool for quality control and correction of head motion in simultaneous PET/MR.

Published on Jul 29, 2014in EJNMMI Physics3.309
· DOI :10.1186/2197-7364-1-S1-A36
Sune H. Keller18
Estimated H-index: 18
(Copenhagen University Hospital),
Casper Hansen9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Copenhagen University Hospital)
+ 8 AuthorsAdam E. Hansen34
Estimated H-index: 34
(Copenhagen University Hospital)
We present a study using MR navigators sampled between other protocolled MR sequences during PET/MR brain scanning, to make motion-QC and motion correction (MC) feasible in clinical simultaneous PET/MR, obviating the need for special MR sequences with interleaved (dense) navigators. During 30 min [11C]-PiB (453±148 MBq) PET listmode scans of 29 patients on the Siemens mMR, a set of 10 3D navigator volumes was acquired (2D EPI 3.0x3.0x3.0 mm3 voxels, 64x64 matrix, 36 slices, TE 30 ms, TR 3,000 ms) in between other scheduled MR acquisitions at 6 time points. The rigid motion between navigators was calculated (all motions given are for a point in the cortex 6 cm from the scanners cFOV). The 3 patients with largest motion (11, 8 and 8 mm) and the only 2 PiB-positive patients with motion > 4 mm (8 and 6 mm motion) were reconstructed into 6 frames with frames being split at the midpoint between navigator start times (framing [mean±SD]: 259±8, 306±8, 191±2, 342±2, 546±1, 157±19 seconds) and then averaged to one image after MC. A blinded evaluation comparing non-MC and MC PiB images was performed by a nuclear medicine physician. The average maximum motion magnitude was 3.9±2.4 mm (1 to 11 mm). The visual evaluation of the 5 MC patients rated 3/5 non-MC images blurred (average score: 3.4±0.5 on a scale of 1-5) and 0/5 MC images blurred (score: 4.0±0.0) with no correlation between motion magnitude and rating. A slight, overall decrease in blurring and an increase in image quality rating with MC was found, but with no impact on clinical outcome. The effect of MC is limited with PiB, but with other tracers (e.g. FDG), longer scans, smaller ROIs or larger motion magnitudes, navigators are easily used for motion-QC and MC in clinical practice.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
Cited By3
#1Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar (Medical University of Vienna)H-Index: 6
#2Otto Muzik (WSU: Wayne State University)H-Index: 73
Last. Thomas Beyer (Medical University of Vienna)H-Index: 57
view all 5 authors...
State-of-the-art patient management frequently mandates the investigation of both anatomy and physiology of the patients. Hybrid imaging modalities such as the PET/MRI, PET/CT and SPECT/CT have the ability to provide both structural and functional information of the investigated tissues in a single examination. With the introduction of such advanced hardware fusion, new problems arise such as the exceedingly large amount of multi-modality data that requires novel approaches of how to extract a m...
#1Martin Lyngby Lassen (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center)H-Index: 12
#2Jacek Kwiecinski (BHF: British Heart Foundation)H-Index: 17
Last. Piotr J. Slomka (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center)H-Index: 76
view all 10 authors...
: Patient motion degrades image quality, affecting the quantitative assessment of PET images. This problem affects studies of coronary lesions in which microcalcification processes are targeted. Coronary PET imaging protocols require scans of up to 30 min, introducing the risk of gross patient motion (GPM) during the acquisition. Here, we investigate the feasibility of an automated data-driven method for the detection of GPM during PET acquisition. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with stable coro...
#1Jacobo Cal-GonzalezH-Index: 13
#2Ivo RauschH-Index: 16
Last. Thomas BeyerH-Index: 57
view all 8 authors...
State-of-the-art patient management frequently requires the use of non-invasive imaging methods to assess the anatomy, function or molecular-biological conditions of patients or study subjects. Such imaging methods can be singular, providing either anatomical or molecular information, or they can be combined, thus, providing “anato-metabolic” information. Hybrid imaging denotes image acquisitions on systems that physically combine complementary imaging modalities for an improved diagnostic accur...
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.