Comments on ‘Analysing and interpreting competing risk data’ by M. Pintilie,Statistics in Medicine 2006. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2655
Abstract
Statistics in MedicineVolume 26, Issue 19 p. 3676-3679 Letter to the Editor Comments on ‘Analysing and interpreting competing risk data’ by M. Pintilie, Statistics in Medicine 2006. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2655 A. Latouche, A. Latouche [email protected] Département de Biostatistique et Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Beyersmann, J. Beyersmann Freiburg Centre for Data Analysis and...
Paper Details
Title
Comments on ‘Analysing and interpreting competing risk data’ by M. Pintilie,Statistics in Medicine 2006. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2655
Published Date
Feb 13, 2007
Journal
Volume
26
Issue
19
Pages
3676 - 3679
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History