Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models
Volume: 35, Issue: 2, Pages: 359 - 372
Published: Jun 1, 2011
Abstract
Although the literature on alternatives to effect indicators is growing, there has been little attention given to evaluating causal and composite (formative) indicators. This paper provides an overview of this topic by contrasting ways of assessing the validity of effect and causal indicators in structural equation models (SEMs). It also draws a distinction between composite (formative) indicators and causal indicators and argues that validity...
Paper Details
Title
Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models
Published Date
Jun 1, 2011
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
359 - 372
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History