Pathology

Sociology

Neuroscience

Work (physics)

Disease

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Infectious disease (medical specialty)

Biology

Microbiology

Pandemic

Engineering

Balance (ability)

Political science

Psychology

Isolation (microbiology)

Work–life balance

Public relations

Medicine

Mechanical engineering

Human Resource Development International

Popular representations of remote work often depict it as a flexible, technologically feasible, and family-friendly work arrangement. Have the images of remote working as a desirable work arrangement been challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic? What have we learned from the widespread involuntary remote work imposed on many employees during this time? To answer these questions, we analysed 40 recent empirical studies that examined work-life balance while working from home during the pandemic. Our analysis was informed by the person-environment fit theory and complemented by literature reviews on remote work conducted prior to the pandemic. We found four themes representing misfits between desirable expectations and the undesirable realities of remote work: (1) flextime vs. work intensity, (2) flexplace vs. space limitation, (3) technologically-feasible work arrangementvs. technostress and isolation, and (4) family-friendly work arrangement vs. housework and care intensity. We highlight the important role HRD practitioners can play in assisting employees to achieve a fit between their expectations and experiences of remote work.

Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners