Physics

Psychological resilience

Resilience (materials science)

Construct (python library)

Variety (cybernetics)

Philosophy

Artificial intelligence

Psychology

Power (physics)

Programming language

Scale (ratio)

Foregrounding

Computer science

Linguistics

Quantum mechanics

Reliability (semiconductor)

Social psychology

Thermodynamics

Journal of Communication

According to the communication theory of resilience (CTR; P. M. Buzzanell, 2010), people reintegrate from disruptive events and construct a new normal through five interrelated processes: (a) crafting normalcy; (b) affirming identity anchors; (c) maintaining/using communication networks; (d) constructing alternative logics; and (e) foregrounding productive action while backgrounding negative emotions. Enacting these processes creates tensions between continuity and change. This article develops a Communication Resilience Processes Scale (CRPS) to assess CTR processes in response to a variety of disruptive events. Items were created and refined via a scale development study with feedback from expert raters. Studies 2 and 3 offer initial support for the 32-item CRPS’ reliability and convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. Models in which the five CTR processes are subsumed by a single, higher-order resilience factor versus two higher-order interrelated factors (continuity and change) are compared. Future directions for exploring continuity/change tensions and identifying CTR boundary conditions are discussed.

Developing and Validating the Communication Resilience Processes Scale