Using Alternative Bibliometric Indices to Characterize High-Impact Articles Published in the Field of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 144 - 150
Published: Apr 12, 2021
Abstract
Background: Conventional measures of scholarly impact derived from citation count do not account for academic readership and do not measure impact on the nonacademic audience (ie, the general population that does not engage in scholarship). To more broadly characterize attention received by research articles, alternative measures have been developed, including Mendeley readership and Altmetric Attention scores. Together, these metrics reflect...
Paper Details
Title
Using Alternative Bibliometric Indices to Characterize High-Impact Articles Published in the Field of Facial Plastic Surgery
Published Date
Apr 12, 2021
Journal
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
144 - 150
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.