Outcome (game theory)

Quality (philosophy)

Management system

Engineering

Philosophy

Agile software development

Systems engineering

Scope (computer science)

Quality management

Economics

Computer science

Management science

Process management

Management

Epistemology

Project management

Critical success factor

Operations management

Mathematical economics

Software engineering

Programming language

Stakeholder

Project Management Journal

Three project management approaches—traditional, agile, and hybrid—were considered in this study. Results from an international study, including 477 cross-industry projects, indicated that 52% of projects could be categorized as hybrid approaches. A regression analysis using multiple outcome measures indicated substantial explanatory power (0.21 &lt; R 2 &lt;0.41). Analysis suggested that hybrid and agile approaches significantly increase stakeholder success over traditional approaches while achieving the same budget, time, scope, and quality outcomes. Hybrid approaches were found to be similar in effectiveness to fully agile approaches. Results validate decisions by practitioners to combine agile and traditional practices and suggest that hybrid is a leading project management approach.

Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice?