Hydrostatic test

Linguistics

Engineering

Philosophy

Government (linguistics)

Personal protective equipment

Medical physics

Computer science

Durability

Medical emergency

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Mechanical engineering

Database

Economic shortage

Infectious disease (medical specialty)

Medicine

Forensic engineering

Disease

Pathology

American Journal of Infection Control

BackgroundMedical gowns are essential personal protective equipment (PPE) that prevents the spread of microorganisms and bodily fluids. During surge capacity situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, reusable PPE is often recommended due to shortages.MethodsThis research evaluated the performance of disposable versus reusable medical gowns by assessing their ability to provide adequate protection across their expected service lifespan. Level I, II, and III gowns were tested for water resistance and hydrostatic pressure, along with other durability assessments (breaking, tear, and seam strength, pilling resistance, dimensional stability, and air permeability, colorfastness, and fabric hand) per standard test methods. Data were collected at new for the disposable gowns and after 1, 25, 50, and 75 industrial launderings for the reusable gowns. Results were compared to the Association of the Advancement Instrumentation® (AAMI) PB70 performance specifications.ResultsLevel I and II disposable gowns did not meet AAMI performance specifications for impact penetration water resistance. All 3 levels of disposable gowns also failed to meet the American Society for Testing and Materials performance requirements for breaking strength in the crosswise direction.ConclusionsThe adoption of reusable gowns may result in increased protection and significant cost savings due to their superior durability and sustainability when compared to disposable gowns.

Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison