Undersampling

Data consistency

Operating system

Iterative reconstruction

Computer science

Classical mechanics

Physics

Supervised learning

Pattern recognition (psychology)

Mathematics

Artificial intelligence

Combinatorics

Deep learning

Acceleration

Compressed sensing

Ground truth

Artificial neural network

Consistency (knowledge bases)

Machine learning

Disjoint sets

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Purpose To develop a strategy for training a physics‐guided MRI reconstruction neural network without a database of fully sampled data sets. Methods Self‐supervised learning via data undersampling (SSDU) for physics‐guided deep learning reconstruction partitions available measurements into two disjoint sets, one of which is used in the data consistency (DC) units in the unrolled network and the other is used to define the loss for training. The proposed training without fully sampled data is compared with fully supervised training with ground‐truth data, as well as conventional compressed‐sensing and parallel imaging methods using the publicly available fastMRI knee database. The same physics‐guided neural network is used for both proposed SSDU and supervised training. The SSDU training is also applied to prospectively two‐fold accelerated high‐resolution brain data sets at different acceleration rates, and compared with parallel imaging. Results Results on five different knee sequences at an acceleration rate of 4 shows that the proposed self‐supervised approach performs closely with supervised learning, while significantly outperforming conventional compressed‐sensing and parallel imaging, as characterized by quantitative metrics and a clinical reader study. The results on prospectively subsampled brain data sets, in which supervised learning cannot be used due to lack of ground‐truth reference, show that the proposed self‐supervised approach successfully performs reconstruction at high acceleration rates (4, 6, and 8). Image readings indicate improved visual reconstruction quality with the proposed approach compared with parallel imaging at acquisition acceleration. Conclusion The proposed SSDU approach allows training of physics‐guided deep learning MRI reconstruction without fully sampled data, while achieving comparable results with supervised deep learning MRI trained on fully sampled data.

Self‐supervised learning of physics‐guided reconstruction neural networks without fully sampled reference data