Psychology

Ambivalence

Ecology

Social psychology

Engineering

Telecommunications

Physics

Structural engineering

Finance

Business

Corporate governance

Biology

Frame analysis

Marketing

Political science

Quantum mechanics

Public relations

Computer science

Agriculture

Scale (ratio)

Frame (networking)

Sociology

Content analysis

Framing (construction)

Social science

Industrial organization

Sociologia Ruralis

Meso‐scale actors – such as farm advisors and other extension agents – are increasingly recognised as playing a critical role in managing farmer uncertainty associated with smart farming implementation. However, there has been limited research to date on how these actors navigate smart farming implementation within specific industries or commodity sectors. This article applies theoretical insights from the technological frames literature to investigate how meso‐scale actors in the Australian rice industry frame smart farming technology implementation, and the ways in which relationships between frames variously afford and/or constrain industry sovereignty over implementation of technological change. Through analysis of our data, we reveal a complex relationship between participants’ technological frames involving frame incongruence , frame ambivalence and frame switching . We argue that while development of a more integrated approach to enhancing the digital capacities of meso‐scale actors advocated in the literature provides a way of addressing frame incongruence, more flexible strategies may be needed to address frame ambivalence and switching. Furthermore, we contend that those frame relationships supporting industry sovereignty – namely frame ambivalence and switching – may not always be conducive to the promotion of digital agency among meso‐scale actors, and could in fact impose limits on smart farming implementation.

Framing Agri‐Digital Governance: Industry Stakeholders, Technological Frames and Smart Farming Implementation