Privacy policy

Law and economics

European Union law

Legislation

Jurisdiction

Data Protection Act 1998

Economics

Business

International trade

Information privacy

Extraterritoriality

Information privacy law

Political science

Right to be forgotten

Data Protection Directive

General Data Protection Regulation

European union

AJIL Unbound

The deterritorialization of the Internet and international communications technology has given rise to acute jurisdictional questions regarding who may regulate online activities. In the absence of a global regulator, states act unilaterally, applying their own laws to transborder activities. The EU's “extraterritorial” application of its data protection legislation—initially the Data Protection Directive (DPD) and, since 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—is a case in point. The GDPR applies to “ the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union , where the processing activities are related to: (a) the offering of goods or services . . . to such data subjects in the Union; or (b) the monitoring of their behaviour . . . within the Union.” It also conditions data transfers outside the EU on third states having adequate (meaning essentially equivalent) data protection standards. This essay outlines forms of extraterritoriality evident in EU data protection law, which could be legitimized by certain fundamental rights obligations. It then looks at how the EU balances data protection with third states’ countervailing interests. This approach can involve burdens not only for third states or corporations, but also for the EU political branches themselves. EU law viewed through the lens of public international law shows how local regulation is going global, despite its goal of protecting only EU data subjects.

The GDPR as <i>Global</i> Data Protection Regulation?

The GDPR as Global Data Protection Regulation?