Image quality

Image noise

Iterative reconstruction

Computer science

Diagnostic accuracy

Radiology

Image (mathematics)

Artificial intelligence

Medicine

Nuclear medicine

Gold standard (test)

Angiography

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography

Background Advances in image reconstruction are necessary to decrease radiation exposure from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) further, but iterative reconstruction has been shown to degrade image quality at high levels. Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers unique opportunities to overcome these limitations. The present study compared the impact of DLIR and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) on quantitative and qualitative image parameters and the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the standard of reference. Methods This retrospective study includes 43 patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and ICA. Datasets were reconstructed with ASiR-V 70% (using standard [SD] and high-definition [HD] kernels) and with DLIR at different levels (i.e., medium [M] and high [H]). Image noise, image quality, and coronary luminal narrowing were evaluated by three blinded readers. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against ICA. Results Noise did not significantly differ between ASiR-V SD and DLIR-M (37 vs. 37 HU, p = 1.000), but was significantly lower in DLIR-H (30 HU, p < 0.001) and higher in ASiR-V HD (53 HU, p < 0.001). Image quality was higher for DLIR-M and DLIR-H (3.4–3.8 and 4.2–4.6) compared to ASiR-V SD and HD (2.1–2.7 and 1.8–2.2; p < 0.001), with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality. Consistently across readers, no significant differences in sensitivity (88% vs. 92%; p = 0.453), specificity (73% vs. 73%; p = 0.583) and diagnostic accuracy (80% vs. 82%; p = 0.366) were found between ASiR-V HD and DLIR-H. Conclusion DLIR significantly reduces noise in CCTA compared to ASiR-V, while yielding superior image quality at equal diagnostic accuracy.

Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy