Respiratory minute volume

Engineering

Ventilation (architecture)

Anesthesia

Hypoventilation

Mechanical engineering

Intubation

Endotracheal tube

Internal medicine

Respiratory system

Medicine

Hyperventilation

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Background Studies have shown that providing adequate ventilation during CPR is essential. While hypoventilation is often feared by most caregivers on the scene, the most critical problem remains hyperventilation. We developed a Ventilation Feedback Device (VFD) for manual ventilation which monitors ventilatory parameters and provides direct feedback about ventilation quality to the rescuer. This study aims to compare the quality of conventional manual ventilation to ventilation with VFD on a simulated respiratory arrest patient. Methods Forty healthcare providers were enrolled and instructed to ventilate a manikin simulating respiratory arrest. Participants were instructed to ventilate the manikin for 5 min with and without the VFD in random order. They were divided in two groups of 20 people, one group ventilating through a mask and the other through an endotracheal tube. Results Ventilation with the VFD improved from 15 to 90% ( p &lt; 0.001) with the mask and from 15 to 85% ( p &lt; 0.001) with the endotracheal tube (ETT) by significantly reducing the proportion of hyperventilation. The mean ventilation rates and tidal volumes were in the recommended ranges in respectively 100% with the mask and 97.5% of participants with the ETT when using the VFD. Conclusion VFD improves the performance of manual ventilation by over 70% in different simulated scenarios. By providing the rescuer direct feedback and analysis of ventilatory parameters, this device can significantly improve ventilation while performing CPR and thus save lives.

Ventilation feedback device for manual ventilation in simulated respiratory arrest: a crossover manikin study